Another article that highlighs inherent flaws in the American legal system. How can this potentially be an actual lawsuit? How can “journalists” even entertain reporting on this?

Honestly I’m just posting to laugh at my fellow lemmings responses and watch see how the plaintiff is roasted for not gitting gud.

But, there is a real conversation here around continued ignorance of game development and the value of difficult games as a value proposition. Afterall, the person attempting to sue from did choose to purchase the games willingly knowing they’re not for scrub casuals like themselves.

What do you all think, is difficulty gating content a real issue? Should dev’s have some kind of legal requirement to appease players that can spec a build properly? Is it Thursday and I’m just looking for some easy laughs at a morons expense?

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. You can file the paperwork to attempt to sue anyone for anything. It doesn’t mean it will be accepted by the court, or that the judge will not summon you there specifically to laugh in your face, declare your suit frivolous, throw you out, and refuse to validate your parking.
    2. If Jabroni thinks he’s having it rough with Elden Ring, he ought to go back and try out the first couple of King’s Field games…
    • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      From reading his posts, he doesn’t think the game is too hard he thinks there’s an entire game hidden inside Elden Ring. He claims there’s an entire parallel universe for the lands between hidden in the game files and no one has found it because they purposely hid this final “50% of the game” and made it impossible to find.

      • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Holy hell I kinda hope they actually let this go to trial just to make him present his “evidence”

        • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not sure and I don’t exactly understand that part. It has to do with the themes and messages behind Bloodborne and how that game is a metaphor for awakening true humanity or something along those lines. But that was just a cross franchise hint for the actual parallel universe in Elden Ring.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean if so then good! If he has any evidence he could fucking share about it then we can go on trying to solve the puzzle. It would be a bold and striking move that would put from software aseven more transcendent a developer

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The “evidence” most likely came to him when he forgot to take his pills. From Software games have a huge following of people hunting for cut content, going through every item for its lore etc. They even got Armored Cores into the game, and tarnished into Armored Core. If there was anything, it would be known on release basically.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    People can sue for whatever reason they want, but that doesn’t mean a court will entertain it. I’m sure whatever judge this is put in front of will dismiss it immediately.

    As for the difficulty discussion. Not all games are made for all players, and that’s OK. If it’s too hard for you, play sometime else. Soulsborne games do not need difficulty settings, and I’m glad they don’t.

  • Sordid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    there’s a guy on 4chan who’s planning to sue Fromsoft

    Lol, no. There’s a guy on 4chan who’s saying wildly outlandish shit in order to have a laugh at anyone who takes it seriously.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m convinced that FromSoftware has the biggest weirdos as their fanbase. I never played a FromSoftware game before elden ring, and i wish i would’ve just played the game and never looked at forums or wherever they throw up their opinions. Before i bought the dlc i watched a video that was titled something like: the elden ring dlc is really bad or something like that. The video had a ton of views and a lot of people seemed to agree, so i watched it, because i wasn’t sure if i should spend the money or not. The video made me actually mad because of how absolutely stupid it was. The brain-dead dude even got mad because of the word “scadutree” “Yeah what is that, i’m pretty sure it’s supposed to be called shadowtree, they can’t even get that right.” These guys have some sort of disability where they can’t enjoy the game if they use anything but a stick as a weapon.

      Imagine someone complaining about DOOM because it’s too hard, and you go:"i don’t know, once you get the plasma cannon… "I DON’T USE THE PLASMA CANNON, I ONLY USE THE STARTER PISTOL, WHY DO THE DEVS MAKE THE GAME SO HARD? SHOTGUNS ARE FOR BABIES JUST PISTOL.

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    In America, you can sue anyone for literally anything.

    Doesn’t mean you’ll win, but it’s basically a highly enshrined natural right that only the rich can make best use of.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d say it’s absolutely insane that someone might actually be able to take the creators of Elden Ring to court over the fact they’re not good enough to beat a game intentionally made to be hard. I imagine they’re the same people who would try and sue Sintendo over a Mrio Mker level that they can’t beat first try.

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The article is using as a source a 4chan post that had a docket number that didn’t check out. I’m pretty sure this is a joke someone took seriously because they needed to publish something today.

      This would get almost immediately dismissed by any judge.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I the US you can sue anyone for anything. You’ll lose for stuff like this post, but you can do it all you want. The fact anyone is reporting on this is the issue. It should be ignored.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is like suing an MMO because you want to solo raid dungeons so you can enjoy the content without having to play multiplayer.

    Don’t get me wrong, their opinion is fine. But the lawsuit is idiotic. Just do what the rest of us do when we’re screwed over by circumstance and choices: build a bridge and get over it.

    The only circumstance I could see a “too hard” lawsuit maybe possibly hypothetically working out is if the customer was disabled. They might have a slim chance if they could use the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) to sledgehammer the game developer with. I personally don’t believe it would work, but I’m not a lawyer so what the hell do I know.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t even think the ‘too difficult’ crowd will get behind this person. What an insanely stupid thing to try and pull off.

      And if it is successful, all it will do is harm the gaming industry into hegemony.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Who is it, QuantumTV?

    It is a game that is difficult, made by a company that is widely known for making some of the highest difficulty games in gaming. And arguably, Elden Ring is their easiest game. This guy signed up for it. If he didn’t know, its his fault.

    There is no lawsuit here, this gets thrown out instantly. FromSoftware makes games and they can make whatever they want. If people don’t want their games, then they won’t buy them.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have given dark souls II more chances then any other in the series. And man from was more then a little assholish there. Iron keep can kiss my ass

      • Abnorc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Somehow I had a way harder time with Elden Ring than Dark Souls 1 or 2, but difficulty is a bit subjective.

      • leavemealone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Fume Knight says hi. At the end I near perfected him but damn that took me a long time. Orphan of kos is a never again situation for me though.

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Buy game that is wildly known to be too difficult for some. Made by studio known for making games too difficult for some.

    Throws a fit and sues studio.

    Yeah, that sounds like a skill issue.

    Edit: It gets worse.

    The player references not only Elden Ring but also Bloodborne in this regard. He says that game director Hidetaka Miyazaki cut a large chunk of Bloodborne out of the game. This was revealed in an interview where Miyazaki discussed players transforming into a beast. The player believes that this transformation feature is in Bloodborne but wasn’t ever added to the playable game.

    https://nexushub.co.za/nexus/elden-ring-player-sues-from-software-over-difficult-and-inaccessible-game.html

    This person is just plain mentally challenged. And I don’t mean that as an insult. Shit, that’s actually sad.

    • GiantRobotTRex@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The player believes that this transformation feature is in Bloodborne but wasn’t ever added to the playable game.

      Uhh… What? It was added in the DLC with the Beast’s Embrace rune. Equip that rune and the Beast Claw and voila! You’re now a beast.

  • josefo@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree with the general sentiment of my fellow commenters, however, coffee is hot, and there are labels on the coffee stating that because of a lawsuit like this. What a interesting precedent to games will this set. How you put a disclaimer in a game stating it’s difficulty level? Compared to what?

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Plaintiff will have to prove some form of legally enshrined harm has occurred.

      I can’t imagine what kind of results from not winning due to difficulty that may be appealing to a judge as a form of ‘damage’.

      • josefo@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Emotional trauma? Discrimination? Ableism? With this games accessibility has been the ongoing issue, they could argue around that.

  • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I do not always have time to “git gud” at a game. Sometimes I want to sit down and play a game for fun, not frustration. I might have played Elden Ring for more than an hour if it had an easier difficulty.

    • vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The question is, does the responsibility fall on you to choose games that fit your skill level or the developer to compromise their vision to accomodate a broader audience? Would we take the same stance with other art? I find a lot of Foreign Arthouse Films to be slow paced and unenjoyable. Should the writers and directors be required to make an alternate cut to accomodate my preferences?

      • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Many games, have varying difficulty levels. AFAIK movies have never had anything like that.

        I have also seen cuts of movies that were horrible, and then an alternative cut is released that is leaps and bounds better.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          AFAIK movies have never had anything like that.

          Try watching Primer.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            To be fair they’re still right to say that there are no difficulty settings on that film, it’s just set at fuck you difficulty from the beginning

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You know I could have played Euro Truck simulator for more than an hour if it had been an online pay-to-win MOBA.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you had played it longer than an hour you probably would have gotten good.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or they wouldn’t. I tried, died with the first enemy every time, refunded the game. Not everyone can “git gud”.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          So your argument against playing for longer than an hour and getting good is playing less than two hours and refunding? You need to play the game for a few hours to understand the combat systems and the way that enemies react.

          The first enemy is meant to destroy you. You skip him and find other things to do and come back later when you’ve leveled up. It’s an open world game.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Let them not like the game for gods sake, they are in their right to refund it, they are not complaining about the game, just saying that it’s not for them. I love it and have tons of hours played + spent reading the wiki but it’s not for everyone and it’s cool of they don’t like it.

            • teft@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think you need to reread my comments. I don’t really care if someone likes the game or not. I only care if someone says they can’t get good at it when they put in less than the minimal effort. It makes me wonder if people like that gave up riding a bike since they couldn’t ride professional downhill racing tracks in the first hour of learning to ride.

              • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I find my comment completely valid. That “minimal” effort is just entertainment gate keeping. If they don’t have it in them to spend that extra effort it’s their choice and if you want them to change, complaining about it is very backwards.

                You could have suggested them to ignore the tree sentinel or Margit, hoever was their first enemy, you could have suggested the to explore the game and ignore hard enemies just like in skyrim we ignored trolls, bears or dragons until we levelled up… Idk, anything but “you didn’t even try how dare you say you don’t like it” wtf.

                If someone in their adulthood gets berated for being demotivated by not being as good as their peers at swimming or riding a bike, telling them off will just shut them about the idea of trying.

                • teft@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You could have suggested them to ignore the tree sentinel or Margit, hoever was their first enemy, you could have suggested the to explore the game and ignore hard enemies just like in skyrim we ignored trolls, bears or dragons until we levelled up… Idk, anything but “you didn’t even try how dare you say you don’t like it” wtf.

                  The first enemy is meant to destroy you. You skip him and find other things to do and come back later when you’ve leveled up. It’s an open world game.

                  You mean where I do exactly that?

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s okay for people to not want to take several hours to learn to play a videogame. I say this as someone who has taken the time and likes this game a lot

            • teft@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh absolutely it’s ok to not want to take several hours to learn to play a video game. But don’t say “i can’t get good at this video game” if you’ve only put in an hour or two. That makes little sense. Difficult things take time to get good at otherwise they would be easy things.

              • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I mean, what if I don’t get good after two hours? Will you refund it? Or will I be stuck with a game I suck at that cost $50 or $60 (or however much that was)? Look, I never was good at gaming. Everything I play is on easy or normal. I’m glad most developers keep gamers like me in mind. And as far as I understand, being hard is part of what makes Elden Ring entertaining, which pretty much makes it the opposite for me.

                And pretending that everyone is (or can be) as good as everyone else at everything does not make much sense.