• Crewman@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Texas, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arkansas, Minnesota, Nevada, South Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Kansas, North Carolina, Utah, Missouri, Idaho, West Virginia, Colorado, Mississippi and New Hampshire.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You excluded the most important part of that sentence. The part that explains the law:

      The states that have passed legislation making it illegal for state agencies to work with companies that boycott Israel include…

      There’s no law stopping you as a citizen from boycotting, or recommending boycotting a business. This law targets business boycotts exclusively.

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I guess business owners and government workers, who are all citizens themselves, don’t have Constitutional rights any more. Yay?

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can act and voice your opinion as a private citizen, even if you own a business or work for the government. The law affects state funding from businesses that boycott investments.

          • Veraxus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The state may not penalize people for free speech. Are you arguing that exempting people from state work for exercising protected free speech does not count as penalizing?

            • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              … exempting people from state work for exercising protected free speech …

              that’s not correct, you are still allowed to have a voice as an individual. However it does prevent you or your highest level boss from speaking positively about BDS using their company (and companies are people). ALSO it puts pressure on the work environment to not be out of line and talk about it.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a free speech matter. You are allowed to not buy stuff, you aren’t allowed to say you aren’t buying stuff because of a boycott.

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    have passed legislation making it illegal for state agencies to work with companies that boycott Israel

    How deep is israel in US’ ass exactly?

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Companies and business owners have a right to free speech. These laws deliberately penalize free speech. Ergo, these laws are wildly and brazenly Unconstitutional.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      “What? The land of the free? Whoever told you that is your enemy”

      Zack de la Rocha

      (That’s the part you meant, right?)

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “states where boycotting Israel is illegal” is a sensationalist lie. The article says what these laws actually do

    have passed legislation making it illegal for state agencies to work with companies that boycott Israel

    So it’s all about contracts. That’s still bad but it’s nowhere near as bad as the headlines implies. A law making it illegal to boycott Israel would be laughably unconstitutional.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think laughably unconstitutional seems to be what the scotus is on track to say is perfectly ok, so I think it’s the constitution that is laughable at this point.