So we’ve seen the complaints and the reports and boy oh boy are there complaints and reports.

I’ve discussed the account with the other mods and admins multiple times, and while we agree the volume is a lot, it doesn’t point to a botfarm or multiple people using the account.

Obsessive? Absolutely, but not technically rule breaking… Until today.

Today they indescriminately posted the same story three times from three different sources apparently solely to flood the channel showing a decided lack of judgement.

It’s a valid story from a valid source, the original has been kept here:

https://lemmy.world/post/21098916

The others have been removed as duplicates.

I’m also applying a 15 day temp ban on the account.

“15 days? That’s oddly specific! What’s in 15… OH!”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    Looking at some of their threads, the trolling type behavior seemed directed at users who were already fairly antagonistic to them to begin with, then it turned in to trolling back and forth all the way down.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      So the user you’re responding to just accused me of being a troll. Yet you responded…

      I honestly am getting much more trollish vibe from you than I have ever gotten from monk all the times I disagreed with them and pointed it out.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Absolutely. I have no love for monk. I’ve left communities they were involved with. Generally downvote them on sight. But a lot of the people screaming “troll” the loudest. Are easily as guilty of such behavior as the accused. I don’t see Monk going to others threads regularly seeking attention that way. I generally only see them post on their own posts, or replies to posts they got. And when they post to the politics community for instance. Things that generally would be popular with most there. Downvoted to oblivion and that’s that.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yup. In 90% of cases the answer is “don’t engage and block them” but not enough people do that.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah, there’s a bit of spiderman-meme going on with this. They were a spammer and the duplicated posts certainly raise some authenticity questions, but it seems like the people citing their posting as obvious incivility were upset that they responded to their own antagonism with a dismissive lack of engagement.

      The only other “trolling” they did just seemed to be being anti-Democratic when a lot of people don’t like that and think it requires response. It’s hard to imagine how someone could express those (presumed) views in a way that wouldn’t be considered trolling by them. If this was /c/democrats, that could definitely be considered trolling, but /c/politics isn’t organized as a fan club.