- 6 Posts
- 380 Comments
1·13 days agoWhy?
Why would it?
It doesn’t matter where its hosted
11·16 days agoI really like the filibuster as a system, but only when its real, as in the senators have to talk the whole time. It makes it so they’re actually demonstrating their passion about a cause.
Time to do steganography to talk to my friends I guess
14·17 days agoThe EU is trying to do this at an EU level (and has been for years). As well as an individual country level, Sweden seems likely to pass a similar law in 2026.
https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/26/signal_will_withdraw_from_sweden/
https://www.wired.com/story/europe-break-encryption-leaked-document-csa-law/
Sadly it seems like most of Europe and potentially other “western” countries will follow
The EU is trying to do this at an EU level (and has been for years). As well as an individual country level, Sweden seems likely to pass a similar law in 2026.
https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/26/signal_will_withdraw_from_sweden/
https://www.wired.com/story/europe-break-encryption-leaked-document-csa-law/
Yep lol
IIRC there was actually a study and pedos with access to synthetic CSAM were less likely to victimize real children.
equatable
But they aren’t equivalent. You’re now saying they’re equivalent.
Now I know you’re trolling.
I’m not.
But that’s better than someone who genuinely does think child rape is fine, so that’s good.
I agree, good thing I don’t think that.
You just said I compared not equated…
I analogized, but I’m glad you finally admit I didn’t equate them. Because, shockingly, comparing is not equating. Literally any 2 things can be compared, that isn’t equating.
I didn’t, quote where I did, you’re trolling for no reason to just not admit to being wrong
I didn’t and you know I didn’t that’s why you’re not quoting it
No you didn’t because I didn’t, quote it
If I equated them it should easy to quote where I did, that’s the last I’ll say on the matter until you quote it.
Do you believe he suddenly changed his mind on an opinion he held and shouted to the world, 2 days after it became apparent he might lose his job over it?
Why didn’t he reverse then? He’s never seemed shy about sharing his opinions before.
If someone committed fraud, then went to court and said “your honour, I actually agree with you. Fraud is wrong. I came to that conclusion this morning.” would you believe them?
An opinion however gross isn’t a crime.
It’s what all of your comments have been about. Don’t play dumb.
I never said it, that’s why you can’t quote it
That’s not nice