Package passed Senate late Friday night by vote of 74-24, narrowly averting shutdown and banning Gaza aid through March 2025

President Joe Biden on Saturday signed into law a $1.2tn budget bill to keep the US government funded through a fiscal year that began six months ago and to avert a partial shutdown, according to a statement released by the White House.

“The bipartisan funding bill I just signed keeps the government open, invests in the American people, and strengthens our economy and national security,” Biden said in the statement.

The bill was passed in the Senate after midnight in a vote that fell 74-24. It came after funding had expired for government agencies, but the White House sent out a notice shortly after the deadline announcing the Office of Management and Budget had ceased shutdown preparations because there was a high degree of confidence that Congress would pass the legislation and the president would sign it on Saturday.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was one of 22 House Democrats who voted against the $1.2tn, six-month spending package. The package includes a ban on direct US funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees, an agency providing key assistance to Gaza, until March 2025.

    Biden has already said he will sign the bill “immediately” once it reaches his desk.

    Biden doing all he can to throw the fucking election away.

    Hed rather have trump in the White House than one less genocide against brown people.

    If Trump is as big of threat to America as Biden says (and I agree with Biden there) then the only explanation is Biden has more loyalty to Israel then America. There’s no threat to Israel’s existence, if they stopped the genocide everything would go back to how it was 10/6.

    But if Trump gets elected we might not have another election.

    • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      I see you don’t understand how Congress works. You see, in America we don’t have a dictator who can do whatever the fuck he wants. I know things may be different where you’re from.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Does a budget take effect without the president’s signature?

        I thought I knew, but apparently you’re the expert.

        Edit:

        Here’s an example of Biden acting without going through Congress, and it’s topical too

        President Joe Biden’s administration said in January it was temporarily pausing new funding to United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) after Israel accused 12 of the agency’s 13,000 employees in Gaza of participating in the deadly Oct. 7 Hamas attack.

        https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-deal-bars-us-funds-unrwa-until-march-2025-sources-say-2024-03-19/

        • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 months ago

          All three, House, Senate and President, need to agree to the same budget. As Republicans control (on paper) everything but the presidency it’s not like Biden has true agency. If he grandstands on the UNRWA funding here the shutdown that would follow would be squarely on Biden. Thousands of American government employees wouldn’t be paid and people relying on the federal government for aid and support would be out in the cold.

          The fact of the matter is that the average American voter care more about the US doing well and everything working than they do about Palestine in general and the UNRWA funding specifically.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            If he grandstands on the UNRWA funding here the shutdown that would follow would be squarely on Biden.

            You legitimately believe Biden is reluctant?

            He literally led the charge and banned the aid himself till it could be passed legislatively…

            President Joe Biden’s administration said in January it was temporarily pausing new funding to United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) after Israel accused 12 of the agency’s 13,000 employees in Gaza of participating in the deadly Oct. 7 Hamas attack.

            https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-deal-bars-us-funds-unrwa-until-march-2025-sources-say-2024-03-19/

            • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              You’re being downvoted here because you set the goalpost as “Biden shouldn’t sign this pro-Israel, anti-palestine budget because he’ll lose the election” when that is refuted you then move it to “Biden wants to sign this budget, you’re dumb if you think he’s reluctant”. I don’t think he’s reluctant, but not because he today wants to block aid to UNRWA, because he as a life long career politician knows there’s no such thing as a bill you support 100% if you reach 51% that’s good enough.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Biden wants to defund UNRWA, that’s why he didn’t it on his own before Congress did with legislation.

                That hurts him with voters with a sense of empathy.

                Implying Biden is reluctant to defend UNRWA has zero basis in reality.

                And the justification used to defend it is more flawed than what lead to the Iraq war.

                Shit has consequences. And it’s often complicated, but I’m trying to communicate it as simply as possible.

                It’s not “moving the goalposts” it’s addressing things as they come up because trying to cover everything in perfect detail wouldnt be a social media comment, it would be a serious of books so long no one is ever going to read it.

                If different accounts bring up different specificities, they’re going to get different explanations. Because there’s lots of things that go into shit this complicated.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, let’s be fair to Biden, Congress was supposed to have already given him the TikTok ban he also said he’d sign right away, and that would have shut up a lot of the people who complain about his support for an ongoing genocide

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        What?

        You think if Biden banned TikTok it would make up for funding a genocide and refusing to help the victims?

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh no, pretty much nothing they’re doing is anything I want out of my government, I’m just saying that I think that their preferred strategy for dealing with critics of their policies would have been to shut down the social media those critics are most likely to use and it’s left then a bit out of sorts not having the power to do that handed to them by Congress yet