• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It is the largest positive impact a single person can have on the environment. Kurzgesagt video with the analysis.

    As a vegetarian for decades, it’s also cheaper, often healthier, and isn’t difficult at all once you find some new recipes you like. You also don’t need to switch all at once. Ease into it by cooking one vegetarian meal a week and then increase it as you find ones you like.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Infinitely incorrect. Not reproducing is the greatest lack of a negative impact a single person can have on the environment (which is all going vegan can do, not eating meat will never have greater than a zero net impact on emissions).

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m not watching your YouTube video. if you can’t articulate a compelling reason, just say so.

      I find it hard to believe that it is the biggest impact a single person can have. can you enumerate the other strategies it is weighed against?

      you also aren’t supporting your claims about affordability, health, nor ease with anything but anecdotal evidence.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m not watching your YouTube video. if you can’t articulate a compelling reason, just say so.

        What absolutely trash reasoning. “Please type up a compelling reason just for me, I don’t want to watch a well researched and produced discussion on the topic.” It’s bordering on sealioning.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          I did watch that video. probably a dozen times. it gets posted often. I shouldn’t be expected to debunk an argument that isn’t made.

          I rewatched it after I made my comment though, and it does not establish what they claimed. it doesn’t cite sources, and it’s primary thesis is “it’s complicated”