• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good thing she’s VP to an ancient already. What’s the angle here? We get her either way dont we?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Hey!

      It’s that account that literally just said it has to be Joe because Kamala wasn’t polling ahead of trump even tho she’s not campaigning yet…

      What’s the new reason for why only Joe can be the candidate now?

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Newsweek sucks and doesn’t even link this new wonderous poll. There’s your reason.

              • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                So first off:

                As the horse race shows, those views may not be determinative. Biden’s job approval rating is stable, albeit at a weak 36%. Though neither is broadly popular, Biden continues to have a better personal favorability rating than Trump. And Biden leads Trump by 17 points, 39%-22%, in being seen as more honest and trustworthy, essentially unchanged from the spring.

                What these polls focus on determines their outcome. People think Biden is more trustworthy than Trump. Which is a good thing I guess.

                Second:

                Were Vice President Kamala Harris to replace Biden as the Democratic nominee, vote choices are 49-46%, Harris-Trump, among all adults (and 49-47% among registered voters). Harris’ 49% is slightly better than Biden’s 46%, although she doesn’t have a statistically significant lead over Trump.

                They claim she has no statistical lead. So are we just pussy footing around here yelling at each other? She’s the VP anyway, at 81 Biden has a high fucken chance of not serving the whole term. Not that I’m advocating for that. But the last time we did this, again I’ll reiterate, we fucking lost dude. People dont like swapping candidates this late, it creates uncertainty. Which, could consume Harris’s entire nonstatistical lead. I’m down with whatever, I’ll vote D. But that doesn’t mean I won’t say shit when we are repeating history again either way we slice it.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  But the last time we did this, again I’ll reiterate, we fucking lost dude

                  The last time we ran an incumbent like Biden, we fucking list dude.

                  That’s what you’re not understanding.

                  Everything we normally go off of, says Biden will lose.