That video very clearly states that having the weapon is not provocation to attack.

Also the breakdown of events from legal eagle is very bad, even hoeg law argued with legal eagle about that part of the video on twitter when they released it.

He downplays that a man chasing you throwing stuff at you is not going to do any harm to you may not be self defense kek, he also says “self serving testimony” this is worse than the arguments that the actual prosecutor tried to make lmao.

He also constantly says that one of the shots was in the back as if rittenhouse waited for him to fall on the ground to pop a shot in the back when all shots were in quick succession and the last one hit them as they were falling on the ground. He also says that a man does a “sort of a jump kick” when that was an actual jump kick to the head, that is aggravated assault in every sense of the word and that is more than enough to justify self defense but weird enough he downplays that.

So no, those other would have never been justified in using self defense, they had no valid reason to start chasing and attack him in first place lmao.

He even says that if WIsconsin had a duty to retreat the outcome of the case might have been different as if kyle tried to stand his ground…