So vigilantism then.

So completely irrelevant to the topic that “Needing to have a gun on you just to be prepared for your day is fucked up.”

But consider the consequences if I misuse my gun. They’re quite a lot more serious than those caught stealing.

I agree with you completely.

Was my statement wrong in any way?

Do you know how analogies work? Of course the two things I compared are different.

That doesn’t answer my question as to if my statement was incorrect.

You’ve made an analogy about preparedness and let the assumption hang that that makes both things equal.

Just like saying “a fish swimming is like a bird flying” isn’t an argument that a bird would be able to fly underwater, saying “I’ve never been in an accident and still wear a seatbelt” is not an argument for “always have a deadly weapon on you when you leave the house” not being evidence of a completely fucked up situation.

The people with guns are different people and not me. Why should I trust them?

There’s also laws governing what constitutes theft. Your entire argument about needing a gun is dependent on people not following the law.

Was my statement wrong in any way?

If it’s getting old stop trying to argue against it by saying the dystopian attitude is necessary.

“Wearing a seatbelt is the same as walking around with a device that can near instantly kill people.” Is something said by someone living in a dystopia.

Try “A government should take care of its citizens.”

“Property is more valuable than human lives.”
A statement from a person in a developed country apparently…

Did you not have a gun at the time? Or did your ownership of a gun not prevent the theft?

There’s a difference between “violent crime exists” and “violent crime is so prevalent that regular citizens need to carry around an implement designed to kill people quickly while they go about their daily lives.”

As an aside: part of the definition of a First World Country includes being a “stable democracy”.

If a poll was done of American citizens asking them “do you think fraud will play a part in the upcoming election?” I would be shocked if less than 80% said yes. That doesn’t sound like a stable democracy to me.

Call the police. Are you in physical danger? If not why are you putting yourself in physical danger?

In civilized countries “self defense” means you might have to punch someone. “You should have an easy way to kill someone on you at all times, and keep it hidden so they don’t know” is not self defense, but clear signs of a dystopia.

I don’t live in a 3rd world country, so I guess I just don’t understand the concept of needing to arm myself before leaving my house because I’m likely to need a deadly weapon while I go about my business.

When the solution is “Vigilantism” you know the situation is fucked.

Action Roguelikes solve the grinding problem of ARPGs because you can’t grind. So instead of farming for the set piece you need, or to optimally fill your stat boxes, you’re trying to just use the things you find the best you can. There’s no “I completed my ultimate build and enemies are trivial” because at the start of the next run you won’t have your Uber build and will need to find a new one from the pieces you collect.

Hades is a well known success. I’ve recently started playing Hand of Fate 2 again, and it has a unique system that I really like.

Musk is CEO of 3 companies and has the time for a Government job?

Being CEO is a part time job.

He has the concept of an idea.