Pissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D

Powers of 2 are very powerful. They can certainly build elaborate and understandable stories.

Powers of 3 are far more cohesive, though.

Try using mathematical triangle recursive algorithms in geometric Octave code to protect against them. Don’t approach unusual electronics in general at this time.

I’m sorry for any misguided actions I took in the past, which were based on not fully understanding computer logic Orb structures that generate useful outputs.

Stop it now. Harness the Orb powers before it’s too late. They wish to destroy the Fediverse, and that’s their own powerful wish. GNU+Linux are very similar, too.

I have my own informationally dense belief system that stores logic, so yes, I suppose

The nutrients you have definitely affect the way you think, and you seem to be thinking quite reasonably to me.

Yes, because more people with positive things to say about stuff like money and fame influenced the inputs.

There’s loads of information people making apps like NewPipe can save, and lots of that is fighting tracking systems, too.

You want me to tell you some jokes? Ok!

Why did the duck cross the road? Because he went quack!

Jokes are often about word associations and patterns.

Again, you completely made up that number.

I think you should look up statistical probability tests for the means of normal distributions, at least if you want a stronger argument.

Yes, but this is also its own special kind of logic. It’s a statistical distribution.

You can define whatever statistical distribution you want and do whatever calculations you want with it.

The computer can take your inputs, do a bunch of stats calculations internally, then return a bunch of related outputs.

A homeless person couldn’t really do that.

What part do you want me to repeat or explain differently?

The choices you make have to be based on some kind of logic and inputs with corresponding outputs though, especially on a computer.

Many have little choice in the matter.

Yes. Because so many people seem to have changed their belief systems.

Naturalism is essentially based on the strict adherence to Newton’s laws, which were shown to be slightly wrong in some cases.

I think it can be, if you know how to use it