• silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They could, but doing that on the 2nd round of contempt charges later this week might reduce the odds of his becoming a martyr over it

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Couldn’t they just cut to the incarceration?

      Doing so would give grounds to file for a mistrial if / when Trump is convicted and nobody wants that.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s a normal pattern to how courts work and if a court deviates from that pattern it opens up another avenue for the defense to request a mistrial.

          I get that everyone wants the max penalty straight off the jump when it comes to Trump but its far more important that it be done correctly in order to minimize future problems.

            • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Judges have discretion and discretionary authority to issue contempt, and such orders and penalties are rarely overturned. Most fines and incarceration would definitely happen with less stimulus.

              It’s not fair and it does undermine equal application of justice to not treat Trump like every other petty criminal. The issue is that using every pretext available to delay the trial is Trump’s only game right now, and if you’re playing to win (Trump convicted and/or in jail prior to the election), you don’t give him any pretexts. I get it. It sucks, but it’s the rational move.