• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s primarily due to application disclosure law not having an expiration or qualification for forgiveness. Make one bad choice at 18 and you’ll be working entry-level or manual labor for the rest of your life. Not to mention the difficulty in finding a landlord that’ll rent to you. It’s so close-minded that we don’t believe in rehabilitation or change as a nation.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It really shouldn’t be legal to ask if someone was a non-violent felon (violent felons would need a different classification).

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I know it is, I just don’t think it should be. Way to many non-violent drug users have their lives ruined over an addiction.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Agreed. Our one-chance system is designed to kill addicts. Prison is not rehabilitation, and often leads to the homeless/prison cycle for those who struggle with addiction.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There are some things it’s relevant for, in terms of financial crimes or pharmaceuticals.

        Or a rape charges for working in a SA survivor clinic.

        Elder abuse in nursing homes…

        Etc.

        And all of a sudden when see why we just need to stop categorizing things into felony/misdemeanor and take cases individually

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It is in fact a problem when you can prescribe drugs and are expected to be impeccably honest.

            Is it a bit of a Catch-22? Sure. Should a doctor be able to do heroin? Sure. Should a doctor caught selling heroin to junkies without even checking their health history be able to keep his license or practice medicine?

            Or how about an accountant that embezzled from his clients?

            I don’t know about that one.