• anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Keeping up his hard sometimes I know, but this thread was about the supreme Court decision in regards to keeping him on the ballot.

    • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tunnel vision eh? Another horse with blinders. My statement yesterday was that the GOP should have put up a candidate without a criminal background.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        And the DNC shouldn’t be offering up a candidate that’s enabling ethnic cleansing.

        Your original comment specifically mentioned ballots

        • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          And you’re mentioning the outcome of a Supreme Court decision that never happened. Don’t worry about the Great Replacement; you and the rest of your ilk of degenerates will still be able to find a seat at the back of the classroom indefinitely.

            • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              No, not that decision… this one is where the courts decided that individual states cannot remove him from the ballot. Where was this supreme court decision you mentioned that they decided he should not be in prison? You are clearly confused.

              • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                I never claimed SCOTUS said he shouldn’t be in prison. SCOTUS rules on constitutionality of law, not criminal cases