A Direct is announced for April 2nd to cover the games.

  • Sapphiria 🏳️‍⚧️ [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Can’t help but be a little disappointed. The last few consoles have all been pretty drastically different, but this is just the Switch released again. Only with different connections so you need all new accessories.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      Nintendo consoles tended to be radical, Nintendo handhelds were more iterative.

      The Game Boy and DS lines all built gradually on each other, seems the Switch line is following suit. I assume Nintendo see the Switch as a handheld that can be docked, rather than a console that’s also portable, so I guess it makes sense that it’s following a similar trajectory of previous handheld lines.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        I mean the DS was pretty radical at the time.

        I feel like Nintendo does a huge innovation, then an iteration or two(or a bunch of little changes), then back to a big change. Wii/WiiU, GB/GBA, DS/3DS, switch/2

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Nintendo collapsed its console and handheld product lines for the Switch. We’re also seeing large parts of the gaming industry adopt the Switch form factor for their products. I don’t think there is anything that Nintendo could innovate on that would sell.

      • Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah with Nintendo watching two Xboxes languish and consumer discontent with the recent playstations as well, there’s not a real impetus for something radical in design. Some innovation would be exciting but the Switch and PC Handhelds prove people want big grippy mobile devices, even if they’re only moving between rooms.

        • TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          I mean that’s not what I want, but money talks and I fit into exactly what you said. I did not buy an Xbox, I did but a PS5, but hardly bought (I don’t think I’ve even beaten) any games. The next switch is probably the next console I’m excited about. But it’s not because of the portability, it’s because they still make couch co-op games.

          In short I want to say I don’t care for handhelds but I’ll probably try harder to get a switch close to release than I will a PS6 even though I don’t know how much of a point in either right now. I just have console fatigue, but keep paying into the problem.

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      At the same time, the Switch is such a solid console that a hardware upgrade with full backwards compatibility* is really the best case scenario. People have wanted a bigger screen, better chip, and better joysticks since launch, and now we’ll have them!

      *the video says it’s not 100% compatible, but I’m assuming that’s for stuff like Labo and Ring Fit that need those exact joycon sizes/shapes.

      • Sapphiria 🏳️‍⚧️ [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        Yeah, I guess I was just hoping for more of a new generation type reveal, rather than a sequel to the Switch. Better hardware is definitely a plus though, would be nice to replay TotK or Pokemon SV with better graphics & performance. I still wonder if those two games were meant to release alongside a Switch 2 prior to the chip shortage.

      • avattar@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They’ll probably at least try to somehow make the mig switch non-functional on the switch 2, which could cause some other games to not work.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I get why - the Switch was the successor of both their console and handhelds, and it did very well. Why change it?

    • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’d need all new accessories anyway with a complete redesign.

      I’ve bought every Nintendo console up until the Wii U. Since they abandoned that early, I decided to skip the Switch. I’ll likely pick this up. If this doesn’t do well and gets abandoned early again, I’ll at least get to play all the games I’ve missed over the years due to backwards compatibility.

      • kipo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The Switch has so many good games! Sure, most are available on other platforms as well, but overall it’s such a great system.

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Every single console reveal, there’s a take exactly like this, and it always ages like milk. Every time.