• pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      They are frequently targeted because they offer enterprise grade configurations at consumer prices.

      Which means, there’s a lot that can be misconfigured, and a lot of short staffed and under budgeted IT departments that deploy them, which means they are a good payoff when exploited.

      That’s the bad part, and the good part.

      You really cannot beat their price point to value for professional grade networking equipment. Just take the time to understand what you’re doing when doing your configurations, and keep them updated.

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Very little is changing over time… I have a proliant salvage server running proxmox with some hosts and the router only port forwards to an NGINX proxy manager instance for the web interfaces on those hosts. I run a synology NAS separate from the proliant hardware that runs through the proxy.

        I know I don’t understand it all, and i’m open to suggestions.

        • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Did you mean to send that reply to me?

          I ask because I’m not quite sure what specific suggestions you’re looking for.

          But in general, I would suggest not exposing port forwarding.

          What services are running behind NGINX? What router/firewall are you using?

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Yes, I attribute security significant misconfigurations to a lag between new service deployments and a relevant review by network security (in a business environment. At home it’s just me.)

            So I’m running Milestone VMS, Synology NAS and maybe in a day a minecraft server for the kids, which should all be available outside my home. I’m using the mikrotik HexPOE which is my main router/firewall.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Fairly popular in my neck of the woods and rock solid. I literally had a bad sparky put 230V through one of them. It killed the RJ45, it killed two client hosts on the same bridge, it killed the port, but the Switch itself continued to work. (Still replaced it, though)

      The only thing I find them really bad and ironically replaced them with TP-Link (Omada )is Wifi. (and the fact that they let the promising “The Dude” die).

      Security wise they seem to do their homework so far.

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Fun fact I made my sales team standardize on Omada for all network hardware we are providing (highrise security systems, so SDN is usually out of scope) I was considering replacing my ubiquiti AC Pro soon, but I didn’t settle on a new model of access point yet. What are the mikrotik wifi APs bad at? if it’s meshing I will only have one.

        I didn’t look at The Dude before, but it doesn’t seem depreciated?

        • philpo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Their solution to central management (Capsman) is a burning mess, when WiFi6 came out for a long time(I think 2 years) you were unable to keep older and newer APs on the same controller, so you needed two Capsman instances. Roaming between them is very unreliable and generally their hardware is underwhelming in terms of antenna quality, etc.

          For one AP it is not as bad, but still annoying, if you want to centrally manage more APs it is a nightmare.

          I replaced my MK APs with Omada with the software controller on a LXC and couldn’t be happier - they play along nicely with my MT infrastructure and are way more reliable.

          I really love MT,but not their WiFi.

    • felbane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Mikrotik is pretty decent but their configuration method drives me up a wall. Ansible helps mitigate the annoyance, at least (in that I only have to figure out/remember the arcane incantation for configuring VLANs once, and then subsequently just have the machine do it).

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Mikrotik is great for features, but their UI definitely feels ancient and you will sometimes question why something takes this many steps.
      However, I’ve never had an plan I couldn’t replicate with their routers.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Run them in a lot of places, love them.

      They’re good at being configured and forgotten about.

      My main rack, that’s more complicated, I have proper gear, but mikrotik is great for everything else.

    • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Never used them pal, but seen them used in Enterprise environments?

      Something I’ve found on a SOHO environment though and what I bought a family member?

      Gli-Net mini routers. They come with OpenWRT as a base and then lipstick it with a nice interface. But as always, YMMV

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Years ago, another trade worker on a construction site was using their wifi stuff, and mentioned using it at home. I went and picked up the hexPOE router and i’m pretty happy with it, but all i’m doing is port forwarding and I set up a rule to capture all DNS requests and shunt them into my pihole.

        The documentation is pretty spiffy and public.

        I’m not really sure if this seems good because I don’t know any better, or it’s good because it’s good.

        edit Gli-net seems nice, but i’m a stickler of using a WAP separate from the router. I know I pay more.

        • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          edit Gli-net seems nice, but i’m a stickler of using a WAP separate from the router. I know I pay more.

          It’s exactly why I bought her two of them. One their main router and the other in AP mode ;)