• MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think children have the right to own things, and if children own the goods they buy, children are taxed. What you’re advocating is total parental control over children. That would harm so many kids! Especially queer kids. What if a trans boy spends his birthday money on a binder and hides it from his parents because he knows they’d throw him on the street if they saw it. Are you going to say the goods and services tax on the binder is a tax on the parents? No, that boy has his own property!

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You are steady stuck on taxation. The actual point is that a baby that has just dropped out it’s mothers womb screaming and crying and shitting on itself isn’t capable of helping make decisions for their country. A 25 year old is clearly a fully capable adult at the height of their health and brain development if not maturity.

        At some point between inception and 25 we pile increasing responsibility, rights, and privileges. A 3 minute old can’t drive, read or understand a voter pamphlet hold a job, decide where they would like to go today, decide what they would like to eat, or realistically anything whatsoever. They have no rights other than the right for their caregiver to perform their duties ably to protect the safety and health by making all decisions for them.

        So we have to choose a point between A and B when we think people are capable of taking on that added responsibility. Arguments can be made for different points or even appointing some users those privileges early based on capability. Some are wiser and smarter at 16 than others will be ever. That said the most ridiculous position is to provide that privilege at year zero. This is functionally identical to giving their parents extra votes.

        If you are going to argue for giving parents extra votes argue that position directly.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Parents should under absolutely no circumstances be allowed to vote on their children’s behalf. Voting should 100% be the kid’s choice without any coersion or nonsense.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            neither babies nor young children have the faculties for this task. 16-18 is literally the only reasonable choice