• michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    But they can’t vote and up to a certain point kids don’t really differentiate from parents so you are effectively giving adults more votes for popping out kids.

    If you were stranded on an island with 28 5-6 year olds, an adult teacher, and yourself would you run it like a democracy and let the kids vote?

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I were on a deserted island I’d run it anarchically. I wouldn’t erect a state, democratic or not. But if we must have states, then we must also have democracy.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        So you would let the 5 year olds die because you wouldn’t just tell them what to do knowing they were 5

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I feel like you are dodging the concept that children beyond a certain age are capable of limited self determination that scales up as they become more capable.

              • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Why would the standard be “want to vote” versus are capable of voting. We don’t let kids drive cars at the age that they want to drive. The existing standard of 18 is better. I can very well see letting some 16 year olds vote based on having obtained some substantial responsibility within the community but it would be completely abused to give little upper class white kids yet another leg up so its safer to just make it either 16 or 18 for everyone.