• alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      No more billionaires, but everyone can be a millionaire.

      The shortest path to equality is to greatly reduce taxes on the middle class and increase them on the wealthy.

      It puzzles me why leftist parties don’t all embrace lower taxes for the middle class.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It puzzles me why leftist parties don’t all embrace lower taxes for the middle class.

        They all do. My best guess as to why you’d say this is that you’re including Democrats.

        edit: Or, I could be a self-centered American that didn’t consider others. I’ll do better.

        At risk of a strawman…

        The shortest path to equality is to greatly reduce taxes on the middle class and increase them on the wealthy.

        That’s what’s best for equality and for economic growth. Does this mean Democrats are horribly incompetent? Perhaps it’s that equality and economic growth aren’t their goals.

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fuck. I’m being a self-centered American, again. I’ll do better in the future. Thanks for the help.

        • maccentric@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Considering the strains currently on the environment, finding a way forward that doesn’t require continual growth is likely a necessity for our long term survival (possibly short term too)

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            But, muh’ capitalism!

            If it doesn’t work then we’ve killed all these socialists and communist for nothing.

            (Do I need a /s here? Is it obvious? Should be obvious.)

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        It puzzles me why leftist parties don’t all embrace lower taxes for the middle class.

        Functionally, we don’t have one. The closest is the Green Party, but they’re so powerless that they may as well not exist.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        A lot of leftist view taxes as a good thing, when taken from those who can afford them

        • classic@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Taxes have never been the issue. How they are used is. But that gets obfuscated so that the 99% shoot ourselves in the foot

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Taxes are DEFINITELY an issue when I pay more taxes than many billion dollar corporations.

            • classic@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yes. You (and I, and most of us) are experiencing the end result of the American people being played with a deceiving narrative. “No taxes” is a con game to get us to this type of situation

    • Chakravanti@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re wrong. It doesn’t require no money. It requires that you have rejected the sucker for money.

  • AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    i just want a small property with a yard and a couple trees and room to grow some plants and tinker on projects

    if only i didn’t spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on avocado toast in my 20s

  • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nah I definitely want both. My current hobbies are expensive. My dream hobby of getting a pilots license and a small plane would be really expensive.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      So you want the freedom of getting a pilots license and a small plane.

    • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wanting to be rich would mean wanting to have more wealth hoarded than you can spend. That’s psychotic and doesn’t sound like what you want

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      What if you used that plane every so often to fly others around? Or perhaps you share it with others like a time share?

      It feels like there’s an answer here. I’m just spit balling, though. I’m not even fully against capitalism, I’m just kind of tired of… Well… All the billionaires and dramatic wealth inequality.

    • PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      lol literally. like yes… that’s the point of being rich. unless you have literal scrouge mcduck fantasies of diving into an ocean of momey

    • Chakravanti@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is shallow, sure. That doesn’t, however mean that it isn’t deep. Money is literally both and that’s because it eats your shoe sole and your soul. Don’t believe me? Good. Don’t believe anything at all. I don’t. I know what I know because I listen to “God” the Devil and the Dead. Six one way half a dozen the other. Heaven is what they don’t explain.

      Hold on. I need to thrown the fuck up. Lets deconstruct the evil here. I know exactly what the Devil is saying and why Heath Ledger was murdered by the CIA.

        • J'Pol @lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Seemed fairly clear to me.

          In 1884,  meridian time personnel met in Washington to change Earth time. First words said was that only 1 day could be used on Earth to not change the 1 day bible. So they applied the 1 day  and  ignored  the  other  3 days.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want wealth to be an indicator of a well-rounded member of society, instead of its current role as a proxy for sociopathy.

    Also, how about relabelling excessive financial accumulation as something along the lines of ‘financial obesity’.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Obesity used to be a sign of wealth, and confer higher social status. So oligarchs would be introduced as “the biggest, the fattest, the most corpulent of them all, Richie Apartheington!”

  • BleakBluets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s interesting how this scene was constructed. The blacksmiths and their table never appear outside except when guiding the one lost blacksmith back home. The old man is usually sleeping in the bar mumbling about his lost son (flute boy) until the pre-credits end sequence where they are reunited in the forest. The text boxes normally have a transparent background, but here it’s a darkened floor tile from Sahasrahla’s hut.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not sure what your point is old man, but I can’t get the freedom that the rich enjoy without being rich.

    Deluding myself into a state of bliss when the mortgage is due doesn’t help anyone, especially me.