Now we are getting off topic, but no I don’t. You can run through the Muslim countries and they either are too small to supply troops or are large enough, but want nothing to do with Palestinians. It’s an important question in that peacekeepers will surely be needed in the future. It’s should be part of aa plan Bibi doesn’t have.
You won’t get EU countries, they have their own worries. Ya know, all you want to do is be right. Sorry, but this isn’t a reasonable discussion. It’s you taking offense. See ya later.
Starting to see why this keeps happening to you if that’s your logic
Why? Because I ask a reasonable question? In order to have peacekeepers you need countries to supply them.
Because the UN has been trying to do peacekeeping only to be vetoed by USA
https://www.npr.org/2024/02/20/1232636543/un-security-council-gaza-cease-fire-vote
https://www.npr.org/2023/12/08/1218332312/israel-hamas-war-us-ceasefire-veto-un
The UN does not have its own forces, it must aquire the blue hats from member countries. So, the question remains.
You don’t think any of the countries voting in favor of the ceasefire would add troops?
Now we are getting off topic, but no I don’t. You can run through the Muslim countries and they either are too small to supply troops or are large enough, but want nothing to do with Palestinians. It’s an important question in that peacekeepers will surely be needed in the future. It’s should be part of aa plan Bibi doesn’t have.
There’s more than Arab or Muslim member states on the UN Security Council.
Of course he doesn’t have a plan with the UN, they consider them hamas members
You won’t get EU countries, they have their own worries. Ya know, all you want to do is be right. Sorry, but this isn’t a reasonable discussion. It’s you taking offense. See ya later.
I don’t want the US and world to continue enabling a genocide.
Again it makes so much sense that you can’t find the reasoning or evidence you want