• aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    These were not wild dogs. They were owned. The breed of dog is important for understanding aggression in dogs. Denying that is literally sticking your head in the sand to avoid factual information you don’t want to hear.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Aggression in any dog breed is 100% on the human responsible for the dog.

      Ban Pitts and then scratch your head a few years later when you hear about the German Shepherd attacks, ban the German Shepherds and then wipe the drool from your mouth while you read the article about the uptick in Rottweiler maulings the year after.

      You can play wack-a-mole all you want, the rest of us will focus on achievable solutions.

      • Skeezix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Dog species don’t up their attack trends in response to other species falling behind. If pits are banned the attack rates of other species will remain about the same: much lower than pits.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          I see, so all those tough guys that like to get lots of dogs for home protection. Never walk them. Never train them. Forget to feed them. They’re going to move on to the Rottweiler and that dog breed will luckily be uniquely suited to handle those circumstances and will turn out fine, not aggressive at all.

          Excellent evaluation 👌