Yes, but no.
The source code for Netscape Navigator was open-sourced and has become Mozilla Firefox. The company Netscape is now a mostly defunct brand while Mozilla is a non-profit, public benefit company in service to the Mozilla Foundation, and the Mozilla community.
A lot of great comments here. I just wanted to add that even just your ip address is enough to roughly track your location. When your phone checks gmail you are leaving digital breadcrumbs in Google’s logs of your ip address which roughly tracks your location. App permissions will not solve this. We need strong privacy regulations with teeth.
This seems to me to be a weak substitute for good privacy regulation.
It stings at first, but once you realize you can now play all of the classics on emulators it helps take the pain away.
It must be for wifi that they operate.
Except for tha time with Windows 8 where they tried to get rid of them.
I just want my privacy back.
It’s a discipline.
“> driving out rivals, diminishing competition, inflating advertising costs, reducing revenues for news publishers and content creators, snuffing out innovation, and harming the exchange of information and ideas in the public sphere.”
I feel like it is going to be hard to prove that Google’s anti-competitive actions have inflated advertising costs. Also, did news publishers lose revenue because of Google or was it Craigslist and jobs sites that killed their classified business?
Google is definitely a monopoly and has acted badly, but proving the harm in this way is going to be tricky. The government should go after them for privacy, the place where they have clearly abused their relationship with the public. Google normalizing spying on users has created the data economy that has resulted in us being spied upon us all the time and having all of our personal data being leaked over and over again.
As someone who has administered networks and written policies like this the concern here is that you will run an open network that may be used for piracy, hacking, DDOS or to send bomb threats. Tracing down this type of behavior is required by law and allowing students to run open networks makes this near impossible.
Fmovie is a new one I never heard of before. Good thing they mentioned it so I know to avoid it in the future.
Change is hard. It has been a long road to get where we are today: major OS and Browser vendor support. Users now need to change their behavior.
Passkey is resistant to these attacks, but user adoption is not widespread enough for Discord to be able to mandate it.
Here is a famous faked photo of fairies from 1917 -> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies
A lot of legal detail in this post. Here are three key points I pulled out the aricle:
Internet users have a First Amendment right to speak on social media—whether by posting or commenting—and that right may be infringed when the government seeks to interfere with content moderation, but it will not be infringed by the independent decisions of the platforms themselves.
Underlying these rulings is the Supreme Court’s long-awaited recognition that social media platforms routinely moderate users’ speech
This term’s cases also confirm that traditional First Amendment rules apply to social media
They had no choice but to settle because much of the evidence was the result of torture and could have been invalid in a trial.
Yeah, but the question is who else. Any suggestions?
Did anyone read the phrase “fed up carpenter” and immediately think the was the second coming of Christ?
You should be continually contributing over time allowing you to benefit from the dips by buying low. This offsets the losses and is called dollar cost averaging,