According to Snopes and PolitiFact, you were looking at a fabricated list of Trump’s victims and settlements to make legal issues go away. I have very little doubt victims exist but this list of names and dollars is not based on fact.
According to Snopes and PolitiFact, you were looking at a fabricated list of Trump’s victims and settlements to make legal issues go away. I have very little doubt victims exist but this list of names and dollars is not based on fact.
It may just be a difference in use case. I don’t use navigation apps for my daily and local trips. I use navigation when I’m going to be driving hundreds of miles to a new location and don’t already know how to get there.
If your primary goal is finding out how to get from A to B and not caring about the very fastest way to get from A to B right now, then you don’t need traffic data.
If you have to cross 8 lanes of traffic to end up behind someone, I don’t know of that still counts as “in passing”.
This is usually a good point. However, from my reading of just the snippet and some quotes others posted (and without reading the article myself because I am lazy), it may be that they are prohobiting the inclusion of preferred pronouns. If that’s accurate, then it means they are refining their bigotry to be more precise.
Are you saying that two of the most powerful financial institutions in the world would bribe the politician who does what the billionires want and has explicitly requested bribes in the past? Surely you’re not serious.