I have to ration disk space and internet here is typically not amazing
I have to ration disk space and internet here is typically not amazing
I would just give them the username and password of my account, then they can enjoy tomb raider 3 or something.
For me, it was binging all of House and Stargate
Having no money and deciding that shouldn’t stand between me and media I wouldn’t pay for anyway. Also my local college’s DC++ network, where someone had about 20 TB back in 2006 (which was a bit of a culture shock after having been banned from watching most TV during childhood).
That is a bonkers stipulation put in a law
Only a quarter? O_o also not sure why anyone would be expecting it to be lower
Me, an investor: The ghost of Azov should be in Moscow right now, what’s going on?
Were it only my welfare cheques damaged the Australian army so much
Yeah, I’m pretty sure this lowers birthrates by publishing
I remember I downloaded the FFG Rogue Trader in 2008, and it was just Twilight with the troll face watermarked on each page. That was a long road trip.
But also yes
“With this one simple trick, pilots hate him”
Not a leadership invested in big showy victories to encourage Western supplies, a long land border with their enemies, and a local population in the defended areas that is very unhappy with the state and see the enemy as rescuers?
How does one choose what are weaknesses worth reporting on?
China also makes it legally hard to move capital out of the country even if capitalists want to chase lower wages elsewhere. Good strategy. Money can still flow somewhat, but that factory isn’t going anywhere.
Funny? That’s cool af
Makes pretty extreme implication
Denies any such implication and is insulted that anyone could read it such a way
???
Coward
Most countries are actually fine with political parties on the ballot receiving funding, material/technical support, and terrorist attacks from a foreign power, it’s just the perfidious Cubans banning other parties that do this!
Big fans of watching what Israel is doing and giving it a whirl
Can’t libertarians keep it in their pants for one term? Why not give it a term and do that later, when everyone is obviously happy with four years of your policies?