I agree, you could find it on a schoolyard.
But it’s not weird to get hung up about it, consider my angle: By talking like this, we’re defaming or decrying children. It will lead to less self-determination for young people in general, thus promoting the gerontocracy.
Never ceases to amaze me how this country has children as elected officials.
Could we please please please stop talking as if children are the worst? Everytime somebody misbehaves, there’s someone who calls it “childish” instead of “stupid” or “wrong”.
Well, what we need is some dedicated non-profit company making chips.
nooo the muffins 😭😭😭
how could you encrypt them 🥲
Not really.
Feminism embraces openness in society, including walking your own path.
If that includes deviating from cis male sexuality, then yes, feminism does indeed allow that to happen, if it happens naturally. In other words: feminism does not force you to take part in the toxic masculinity circlejerk.
In that way, yes, feminism probably reduces the amount of “male sexuality” which is basically toxic masculinity in the world. But it does not force that change, instead, it lets it happen.
They predicted pron would condition men to expect sex on demand and sexual assault rates would skyrocket when in fact the opposite happened.
Reminds me of “computer games turns teenagers into killer machines” saying.
I imagine it’s similar to marihuana.
If people find out there’s an easy, relaxed life, they don’t work so hard, hurting corporate profits.
Yeah, I guess you have a point.
Imagine that (hypothetical scenario) MDMA heals 70% of people, doesn’t do anything for 10% of people, but throws 20% of people into mental disturbances.
Would you take it?
deleted by creator
This is excellent. Recognize when batteries make sense, and recognize when oil makes sense.
In this case, oil makes sense.
Yeah well, it ain’t stupid if it works.
There is this game where you get a million dollars with 99% probability and die a gruesome death with 1% probability if you press a certain button.
What would you do in that case?
IMO, statistics isn’t everything, and one cannot only rely on statistics to make meaningful decisions. Lots of people I know wouldn’t press that button.
It violates the principle of locality, and therefore the speed of light as the highest speed allowed in the universe.
Therefore, this truly does violate a law of nature, and is therefore illegal.
It’s not just supervision IMO.
I prepared myself for years before I took psilocybin for the first time, because I knew that it’s going to bring up all of the subconscious shit that I carried around. So I “cleaned” myself enough emotionally beforehand, before taking the fungus.
Now, imagine your typical asshole walks into your medical treatment facility and demands psilocybin. Sure, you can give them psilocybin, but you cannot give them the sense of respect and understanding in front of these drugs.
Edit: by “your typical asshole” i mean, the typical asshole that you would encounter daily. Not you personally or sth.
preventing access to risky behavior is not their job.
I disagree. Lots of people will listen if you tell them about the dangers of a specific medication, but few will understand. Especially if they have no background in medicine or pharmaceutics.
Well, I guess it’s not only that. Psychedelic drugs can really fuck you up, if you aren’t prepared. People talk about set and setting a lot.
I suspect that these drugs sure help a lot of people, but can also fuck a lot of people up really badly. It’s like, people who don’t go along well with these substances, avoid them instinctively.
Now, if someone would prescribe them, I’m pretty sure that a lot of people who are simply not prepared for it mentally (instead blindly trust the medics), would take them and get hurt pretty badly because of that.
This is just perfect. We need more of these projects.
No, I was arguing in good faith; But I see it doesn’t resonate with you at all, so i’ll just leave it.