![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb9cfeb5-4eb5-4b1b-a75c-8d9e04c3f856.png)
This is not a federated bandcamp, it’s a platform for bands to do marketing across mutliple various social networks from one web portal.
This is not a federated bandcamp, it’s a platform for bands to do marketing across mutliple various social networks from one web portal.
From the rules:
All posts must be news articles.
From the post:
abcnews.go.com
QED
Just because the post complies with one rule doesn’t mean that it is now exempt from all other rules. I already posted the part of the rules which it violates: “No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed.”
I’m not sure where you went wrong, but maybe take a few minutes before coming in so hot next time
What does “coming in so hot” mean? Posting something that you disagree with?
This isn’t gossip, the police department confirmed that it happened.
Do you think that “gossip” means things that aren’t true?
Recent developments about prominent figures are news even if you don’t think it’s newsworthy.
The rules of this community disagree with you.
- All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed.
This was a joke, 14 years ago:
but it does make me happy to see articles condemning their moves almost every day
Did you read this article? It’s a pro-Microsoft article published on MSN (Microsoft Network).
Any novel idea that gets a modicum of success is immediately and repeatedly flogged to death by copy-cats, both indie and corporate, for the next several years until the gaming public is sick of seeing it. See any recent successful gaming trend for an example.
This is great! Some feedback on UI:
<a href=""></a>
) for post navigation so that I can tell my browser to open a link in a new tab. Usually I middle-click to do this (in Firefox) but since the post title and content only respond to javascript events, I can’t middle click to open in a new tab. Clicking the post opens it in the same window.Also, it’s a bit late to change it now, but the name is very 2009-internet-startup.
Why not post your blogs to a fediverse platform? Do they need to be on a separate hosted system? You’ll probably get more people reading and engaging with your posts if you are just posting to a Mastodon instance rather than hosting on a separate web platform and hoping that people stumble across it.
Google *had good search. It’s been dogshit for some time now though.
I used Qwant for a few days and then it popped up a modal dialog asking me to turn off my ad-blocker. Never used it again after that.
I’m also going to try using the eSIM to trial Google Fi
You degoogled your phone and then want to route all of your mobile data through Google servers?
Go on then, LTT. Delete your youtube account.
Clip of the moment it was beaten: https://clips.twitch.tv/ZanyIntelligentSwanAMPTropPunch-7MB14zIDcRvO0X-a
Video documentary on the history of this challenge (2022) [5h22m]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXbJe-rUNP8
The jump button. Saved you a click.
The facial animation in Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice is still the best I’ve ever seen, and that game came out in 2017.
Incredible looking game. I hope the sequel lives up to the original.
The article links the wrong paper.
The source of the 7% stat is this report from 2024: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/pdfs/mm7309a5-H.pdf
During 2019–2022, melatonin was implicated in 7% of all ED visits for unsupervised medication exposures by infants and young children.
The article said 7% of all emergency visits (with no qualifier). You said 7% of visits by children which sounds more reasonable. The actual statistic is even more specific than that.
During 2019–2022, melatonin was implicated in 7% of all ED visits for unsupervised medication exposures by infants and young children.
- https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/pdfs/mm7309a5-H.pdf
The article links a summary of the wrong CDC report (June 2022) that does not contain this stat. The report that this stat comes from (quoted above) was published in March 2024 by a completely different group of researchers.
And why did the article say the statistic was for 2012-2021 when the quote statistic refers to the period 2019-2022? Because they’ve conflated another statistic from the same report:
The prevalence of melatonin use by U.S. adults quintupled from 0.4% during 1999–2000 to 2.1% during 2017–2018 (1). This rise coincided with a 530% increase in poison center calls for pediatric melatonin exposures during 2012–2021 and a 420% increase in emergency department (ED) visits for unsupervised melatonin ingestion by infants and young children during 2009–2020 (2,3).
It took me about 10 seconds to find the report and verify the stat. It was the first link returned in the search results.
Journalism really is dead.
Technology also isn’t going to improve drastically any more
https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/ap-en/company/news/news-topics/2024/05/storage-20240514-1.html
No, “we” don’t.