Because once again, Trump just gets away with it. This is fucking bullshit.
Because once again, Trump just gets away with it. This is fucking bullshit.
Part of the solution is definitely weeding out the people purposely working against the good of the country.
Rich guys and private islands… I’m sure nothing bad has ever come of that.
Sure, but do you need some sweet sweet couch in your life? Or if you prefer love handles, perhaps an armchair?
I know right. The logic seems to be “well he didn’t get charged for it so I shouldn’t be either”. Yeah, but keeping weapons safe was your job, not his.
Never heard of them, until he’s elected. THEN they’ll all be best friends.
“Official Act” violence. Can’t wait.
But hopefully he’ll be caught dead in one.
Well at least 2016 got us “Pokemon Go… to the polls!” Eeesh
You know how you have to prepare your house when someone is bringing their kids over (especially if you don’t have kids of your own) ? That what this is. Things have got so bad that they have to bring in a bunch of new rules just so one adult can finish speaking without a other “adult” talking over them the whole time. Holy shit, this is what it has come to.
Aaaaand now we’re back at the piece of shit acting like a piece of shit.
I’m really hoping Quiet Game is a Bluey reference.
I would argue the issue isn’t the existence or marketing of a product, rather how easy it is to procure, which I believe OP is saying. You can argue about how attractive the product is to people, or lack of mental health services until the end of time, but the real and very obvious problem (at least to those outside the US) is just how easy it is for most people to get a weapon capable of killing many with little to no valid reason, checks or training. From the outside this is seriously bonkers.
Except he was found in Pakistan, yes?
And she’s a cunt, right?
JFC indeed! That questionnaire was vomit-worthy, and the ticker at the bottom showing “recent donations” needs work because they’re repeating the same fake names over and over.
Perhaps women should take on The Melbourne Club next and see how quickly men change their mind on the subject?
I understand the guy’s argument in this case seems to be the fact he bought a ticket at the same price as a woman but was excluded from one of the exhibits, but the overarching point of sexual discrimination works both ways.
I’m not from the US so I’m not entirely sure what was wrong, but fair enough I guess.
Removed by mod
And this is how I, a foreigner, know the sun has risen over the US.