so lootboxes were never diabled?

Pretty sure I’ve heard users from these regions mention that they had their shops completely unavailable in certain games

But fines wouldnt be an issue here either to me, maybe Im missing something

I mean they play ball when they are disabled until they comply with the law, no?

Similar to the loot case law change (belgium/netherlands iirc). Or was that handled differently?

what’s hard here, either you follow the rules or you get disabled in EU markets - your loss

finally.

literally why is anarchist NA not doing their jobs here… same with the apple/google offensive just a couple days ago people need to preassure from within, EU can only do so much

reddit too though has the reputation of lacking conservatives… and theres google signin and alat

Since he was part of like 3 other songs on that album: I wonder what Kendrick Lamar’s coment would be, as he was very clear about AI when AI Snoop dogg and AI 2pac were used in a song towards him

“What do you mean you arent forced into 2 sentences max and have to structure your thoughts ??2?”

The extra detail couldve been placed on another more direct position of the sentence is what Im saying… “trying very hard” not “clearly stating the wrong”

But thanks for being so helpful

The extra detail couldve been placed on another more direct position of the sentence is what Im saying…

“trying very hard” not “clearly stating the wrong”

The Trump administration cut funding to Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which was compiling a database of alleged Russian war crimes, including the abduction of an estimated 35,000 children from occupied areas of Ukraine, last month.

I mean the article is very tragic and all. But I cant help it to think the author’s sentence structure here is trying very hard to suggest the numbers were from last month. Am I the only one?

I just posted what I’d ask you too here

We really need forestland to bind C-atoms from the Co2 in our air. That would be the most heroic approach. Also wholesome since it creates habitat.

forest management resulting in slow money

Oh wow, theres more to this discussion, nicely useful!

says:

evaluate on case-by-case basis

So its kind of in a grey zone, not reliable doesnt mean bad source in that case. Useful link, altough wikipedia is also a grey zone in the sense that its information based on open source (everybody can edit it, and most liked proposals get through as I understand)

Thanks for the confirmation

Well what ground news wants to do -critical evaluation and media literacy- is so vital.

But ground news deciding on what exact position on the spectrum a source is, seems to achieve the exact oposite: make people depentend in questioning and finding a variety of sources.

Nowadays everything needs to happen in an instant.

If theres a solution that only takes half a snap, that will be the only relevant choice for the mass. Thats why Im instantly asking, because just today I referred to this source to someone else as a might-be-bad example but instantly realized, I will have to ask this on the next situation (now)

Anyways thanks for the correction!

maybe as European im not too well versed in US sources and judged too harsh based on anecdotal experience. All the news Ive seen are always on the “nothing has been said” or “thats reaching” side.

my bad then

sorry for derailing a little:

why is there multiple links to choose from as a source? What exactly created that choosable format - are they automated, is this some system like groundnews or something?

If only we’d put those things in front of tree groups near highways, that somehow still exist

is newsweek considered a serious source? even this objectively right seeming headline is kind of a nothingburger, isnt it?

sorry for derailing. if thats not tolerated, i will stop

we are past 1,5°

this is something that is past my expectations, idk