As a part of Fisker’s bankruptcy plan, the manufacturer is required to remedy defective and noncompliant vehicles “without charge when the vehicle … is presented for remedy,” the filing showed.
Somewhat unrelated but it’s funny that we can force a company to do this yet somehow people think we can’t get companies to turn over server code when they sunset an online service, or force companies to allow for repairability.
Unless it does one of those classic 180s where it swings back around and hits the atlantic
The fun part is that you don’t have to do all that stuff if you have a long term visa.
Or they’ll march on the capital again and demand the weather machine controls.
Resorts you say Not blazing hot you say
Most data centers evaporative cooling from what I understand, and according to This
Cooling towers use water evaporation to reject heat from the data center causing losses approximately equal to the latent heat of vaporization for water, along with some additional losses for drift and blowdown. In larger data centers this on site water consumption can be significant, with data centers that have 15 MW of IT capacity consuming between 80-130 million gallons annually. n this study, on-site water consumption is estimated at 1.8 liters (0.46 gallons) per kWh of total data center site energy use for all data centers except for closet and room data centers, which are assumed to use direct expansion (air-cooled chillers).
And seeing as hyperscale data centers usually use between 20-50 megawatts per data center, and there’s three of them in Colon, that’s like at least 240 million gallons of water a year.
Yikes.
Yea like moving all the food on the top shelf of your fridge to the bottom and moving everything up shelf by shelf every morning or making sure you vacuum your walls properly. Standard stuff.
God bless that collective. Doing gods work
Man I wonder how they set it up to where they don’t know who runs it
Depends on the training and the output.
Just like if you photographed the Mona Lisa in such a way as it recreated the piece as if it wasn’t a photograph, a model sufficiently trained that can reproduce the original training data, you have copyright issues.
Problem is that many models can do this, but it’s a mathematically improbable occurrence.
If I make a stamp that’s made of 1 billion exact copies of different copyrighted photos and cut it infinitesimally small, and mixed it up, the problem that it can produce the original work that it was made from still becomes a copyright issue.
You’d have to prove the opposite, in fact. That it’s mathematically impossible for your model to reproduce the copyrighted content for it not to be an issue
The newest TikTok trend and thus drug problem seems to be centered around galaxy gas. And they seem to know what they’re doing:
Main thing the US gets from Israel is Market Capital Export.
Israel accounts for what, like 30-40% of all recent American acquired startups?
I think Steam does have enough influence to be able to pull a sizable chunk of users away from windows.
It seems like a very polarizing game, you either really enjoy it or not at all.
I love the division 1 and 2 but the first game had some MAJOR bullet soak issues for the first half-year of the game’s lifetime.
Massive always does good work despite Ubisoft, in my opinion.
Biggest issue I see is that these LLMs tend to repeat themselves after a surprisingly short number of times (unless they’re sufficiently bloated like ChatGPT).
If you ask any of the users of Sillytavern or RisuAI they’ll tell you that these things have a long tail of not being very creative.
It’s important to take Tesla and SpaceX at face value and not to extrapolate future success based on what they’ve accomplished.
Edit: for anyone that follows SpaceX’s current shenanigans, seems like they’ve been using the FAA to scoot permits to launch without proper authorization from other agencies (notably the EPA)
Shit is getting VERY juicy: https://fixupx.com/RepKiley/status/1839066996274516417
They’ve even got representatives just kind of going along with their demonstrably false narrative for the ride.
Oh, yes but the DRM exemption clause means that you can backwards engineer the changes and continue releasing them under GPL
Edit: as an example we should probably be looking at the duckststion situation evolving right now:
“releasing the modified version to the public” would cover them re-closing the source and then subsequently releasing that newly closed source, so they can’t relicense it and then release the built version of the code.
At least not easily, this is where court history would likely need to be visited because the way it’s worded the interpretability of “modified” in this context would need to be examined.
The tinfoil hat in me is telling me this is a play to give them reason to not certify the election