What if he wrote the technology himself? Would that count?
What about games with “procedural generation” - does that count?
What if he wrote the technology himself? Would that count?
What about games with “procedural generation” - does that count?
What are problems that Uber fails to address, that a customer cares about? Twisting words / rules so they can make more money is something public corporations are required to do. They HAVE to maximize shareholder value. Laws set guardrails against that, driven by what society agrees is “right”
Do you… remember taxis?
Yes, public transportation is awesome and I wish it didn’t suck where I live. But publicly traded companies are legally obligated to look out for themselves. The problem is government, yo - that’s what decides what corpos can’t do according to what society feels is “right”.
Far-cry-blood-dragon-wave
Just because it’s possible, doesn’t mean it’s common.
It’s hard to convince tech people to be activists. There’s this other term, in between bougie and proletariat that classifies the people in between. Something like, the people who have it just good enough to not give a shit.
And that’s like all of tech.
That shit was hilarious. Thanks for posting. One freaking glove, dude.
“I bet your tiny hands couldn’t even hold an ar15”
No fucking way any sane person would wanna be at a gun range with him tho
They’re not selling the copy, bruh. They’re selling a technology that very few understand. Smart people pretend they get it, but they don’t. That’s how rare the math is.
Whatever happened to copying isn’t stealing?
I think the crux of the conversation is whether or not the world is better with ChatGPT. I say yes. We can tackle the disinformation in another effort.
But that’s on the LLM side not the bot side.
Thanks to you I finally decided to watch the video of him donut shopping and it didn’t seem that bad. Just some out of touch rich guy struggling to make small talk.
But nowhere near the level of couch-fucking weird everyone’s been claiming.
So yeah I guess it would be better if he were a total sociopath and could more convincingly fake excitement during small talk?
The part that made the video bad wasn’t his behavior, it was how clearly the staff knew it was a meaningless publicity stunt. The staff has enough braincells to know that this guy’s policies, if elected, would do nothing to make their lives better, and that they are just pawns to make him look like he appeals to common folk. This is not something specific to this candidate, but his entire party.
They should’ve just declined him as a customer, or insisted that no recording at all could be done on their property. That would have sent a clearer message to him, unless you think the existence of this video helps the Kamala campaign because they will overreact to it and add it to the “he’s weird” pile. I agree he’s probably that bad kind of weird (I believe all Republicans are either so rich and selfish it is indistinguishable from being straight up evil, are racist, or being blackmailed) , but I don’t see that being demonstrated in the video.
Oops I installed Google photos and now my Gmail is full. Sooo dumb.
I’ll settle for Freelancer
Redo the primary?
Finally, people can enjoy cheese pizza in peace.
But it won’t be “OK” to do. And things that aren’t OK can be prosecuted.
You’re expecting Biden to do your revolution for you lmao
If the system is as broken as you say that you need the president to commit crimes, get out of your armchair.
All y’all are forgetting that if Biden does some wild shit, it would create a precedent and make it OK for Trump to do it too. Please think literally one step ahead.
Authors didn’t invent the alphabet. Painters didn’t invent colors. It’s rearranging pre existing work in a way that makes sense to the rules of a new system. Need a stronger definition to explain the difference.