I counter attack with, using their names to create an online fund raiser to make these reasonable people rich.

I think the author thinks that their articles carry more weight than they do and having the article written about it is the backfire?

Meh, the Access Hollywood tape came up before the election and woman had no problem voting for him then. I don’t think this will have much impact with anyone who hasn’t already made their mind up.

But I also thought he wasn’t going to be found guilty today so fingers crossed.

How? My first thought was this is good. Kids should have to be in the classroom when they’re in the classroom and not on the internet.

And if he wins again, he’s going to Pardon everybody who buys one from him. Including himself. Because there’s no law against it, and nobody thought that there ever needed to be for that either.

All great people.