![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/02153542-3961-4ba6-882d-5fd21c341b2b.png)
![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/fbe4883b-64d2-4dbf-953d-789e884f5d6b.webp)
Do not defame Parenti’s good name like that you filthy lib.
Do not defame Parenti’s good name like that you filthy lib.
The alternative is sitting down, having a talk, drinking some tea and talking about our differences.
You really don’t understand that the things you say have meanings, do you?
The alternative is sitting down, having a talk, drinking some tea and talking about our differences.
You literally talk in your other reply about how you’ll join them. You can’t just sit down and talk about how they want to kill the jews and you don’t - your willingness to hear them out inherently legitimises their ideas as being reasonable and able to be reasoned about.
I know you don’t fully understand how the way that you say something can be as informative as what you actually say, but I don’t need to assume - you did actually tell me in your comment that you don’t really mind nazis as long as they’re not being violent towards you.
US banks won’t even issue chip and pin cards because their customers would find entering a 4 number code too arduous and complicated.
Ok, but it’s what telegram has. So would you rather keep your “free” speech and put others in danger, or lose it to keep others safe?
Just Google the paradox of tolerance. It’s really not as complicated as you’re making it out to be.
Also, punching Nazis is always morally correct. If you wouldn’t attack a nazi because they’re not currently threatening you specifically then you won’t develop any additional moral prerogative in time of civil war - you’ll join them, because they’re still not threatening you specifically, while fair and equal redistribution of resources will effect you. You don’t have any sort of morality or ideology underlying your objection, you just think extreme things are bad because you’re not given a choice.
The issue with pedantry is you have to make sure you’re right - data here is the collective noun for a group of individual data, so is used correctly.
Plus “plummeted by a 33%” was literally right there
Israel is a state, not a country.
Palestine is a country, not a state.
The goal should be to open a constructive discussion and change minds
You just explained how they don’t have a logical position, just a kneejerk reaction to having their behaviour pointed out - you are only fooling yourself if you think there’s a constructive discussion available. Grow up and make them fear physical retribution if they keep spreading such abhorrent views.
It’s tragic, but that’s what happens when your state primarily defends itself with human shields.
The cruelty is the point.
If you think men not being allowed to look at art is actually comparable to the systemic misogyny women have to deal with you’re exactly the type of person the piece is highlighting.
Shutting it down in response to mandating men being allowed will definitely complete the piece.
Don’t be ridiculous, they’ve shot a bunch of men - escaped hostages, their own troops, and, like, probably at least 1 Hamas through sheer probability.
I mean it’s meant to be illegal in Austria, but I still saw a fuckload of Nazis when I went to a football game there.