At least it can set a precedent

Ah yes, im sure you have many figures and sources of why that is a fact

…and it’s totally not your opinion “that human bad and number must go down because I’m smart and cynical”

This is just not true, it’s 4 companies driving almost alll climate impacting technologies, human population has been stabilizing across the board and human race is projected to peak at 10 billion.

We have the resources to accommodate that number. It’s our technology, not the people and it’s fucking corporations.

If you work for the state and participate in silencing people you are traitor to your felllow man, your neighbors, your community.

Okay I’m in, you’ve convinced me

Don’t tell me how to live my life

Unfortunately, I wasn’t alive quite then , so I’m thinking any time before or around windows 95 and up

Does anybody remember a similar mouse trap like game? Like something which pushing blocks and trapping a mouse maybe? Or perhaps you were the mouse and you were avoiding traps to get cheese?

Paradox of tolerance, blah blah

Much like the olden ways

This is great, they were only a way into strong arming employee retention by making them fill locked in to the company

These salary’s aren’t going to cut it.

We need to attract the best for this, if it’s truly meant to parallel the new deal.

This is not going to attract many high impact candidates, and simply won’t pull in people who are experts in their fields. This is not something we can leave to private equity to solve. The government has to get serious about this sooner or later, it’s fiscally irresponsible and inhumane to continue to kick the can down the road.

Now that the roads not too far away, we can still spend big now to save so much down the line.

Because of collateral damage being greater than the value of the car. It makes no sense to chase if it puts other pedestrians in danger, now they can just find them and then arrest them later.

Managed? Every executive I have ever met has been one of four things.

1. A friend of the owners
2. a friend of another executive
3. a fucking corpo brown noser
4. The super rare climb up the ladder guy, but he seems to have discretely pulled the ladder up behind him

Are you familiar with two wrongs don’t make a right?

Or how about the lesser of two evils? Do you think the republicans would have handled this better somehow?

You are delusional if you believe that

Like I said you’re clearly a reactionary moron. Good luck with that, I’m sure you’re a big brave person fighting the good fight.

Oh your “they are the same shit” is so annoying. You both come off as imbeciles. whatever, the options are not great, but come on you got an elderly lukewarm President or an elderly moron president.

One of which actively tried to dismantle our democracy, and their party has blocked almost every initiative they could that help the American people.

Billionaires are eating our world alive and climate change is going to cause mass migration.

You have no sense of civic duty, if we don’t help our neighbors then how the hell are we united as country?

Basically Elon wants to clone WeChat, Chinas all in one app. He could have started from scratch and had an uphill battle with Twitter as the largest competing company or do this instead.

His PR was already getting shitty before buying Twitter, so he pivoted with his rich boy money like always.

He purchased it , destroying it as a competitor for his X website. He gave X recognition immediately as a platform, and hoping that he retains the partial user base of Twitter as the initial backbone for the app he wanted to build in the first place.

Because that’s what fascists do, delete competition