I wonder what thay would smell like.

Claiming you didn’t know it could cause harm isn’t a defense in court in Canada.

Anymore bullshit?

I don’t know about the states, but here in Canada the government takes the position “ignorance of the law is not a defence”.

There’s the argument that you distrubuted it.

Not if it incites violence, causes harm or any of the other carve outs in the first amendment of the USA.

I am aware that the post is supposed to be funny, and you are most likely making a joke, but this is the internet and these sort of disclaimers tend to be necessary.

Except if they were halfway intelligent they wouldn’t have it go automatically to the site.

And when you do this and something goes really wrong criminal charges get laid.

Rest of us can. They’ve been like this for decades.

It does cost them money, more than you have in the account.

Well, the way it’s written and how some people frame the argument, yeah they should have to be in a militia.

2nd amendment doesn’t talk about private ownership of weapons.

I have to wear glasses to see. I have my pair of safety glasses for work, and I have my everyday pair. You know what I do when they get dirty? I take the minute to clean them and then put them back on my face, so I can see.

Your argument of “they get dirty easy so I’ll just not wear them” is a foreign concept. And “I only have 2 pair” is usually 1 more pair than the average person has.

Fucking hell, you’re near-sighted and you don’t wear them because they get dirty? Do you walk around naked?

Others can have a distinct problem picking voices out of surrounding noise.

Could you expand your thoughts on this?

I’m always curious when this is said as to what is meant when Atheism and science are called religious.

It be better if it was the British museum.

Babylon be actually taking shots at Republicans?

Or am I misreading this?