That’s the point
Refugee from another, less-friendly instance. Please forgive the youth of my account— I’ve actually been around here for a while. Still, glad to be here!
That’s the point
You must not have watched the same presidential debate I did.
For instance, I dance a lot. I have even started ballet dancing. And in the past I had an eating disorder. Now I know this may sound a kind of bigoted or stereotypical. But I don’t mean it that way, this is purely based on statistics.
these things do make not a person LGBTQ+
However I feel in no way that I am in the wrong body. I like being a man, I like the idea of masculinity
this seems to be pretty much the qualifying criterion, and, to this, I’d ay no, you’re (very probably) not trans.
But it makes me “worried” if I do end up tran
people are born LGBTQ+ and typically know it all their lives. From you descriptions, it seems like you might just be Bi. Enjoying “non-masculine” activities doesn’t really mean anything in and of itself. Being LGBTQ+ isn’t something one “ends up as”-- it’s something we always have been.
when I already have a wife and children
and so what? sure, there may be some adjustments for them to make, but, unless they’re transphobes, it shouldn’t be a problem.
you mean when he kept responding to Trump’s tirade of lies? THAT was all over the place, so it makes sense that Biden would have to cover a lot of ground.
oh, no disagreement here-- but it’s either Biden or Cheeto Mussolini.
i’m glad you’re not choosing that latter!
he may hove spoken more clearly, but - by no means - is he a better speaker. he spent the entire debate incoherently spewing his unhinged conspiracy theories and lie after lie.
Biden stuttered and is old.
Neither disqualifies him for the presidency
Someone should redub that movie with all of the answers provided by ChatGPT and its voice
Until you can back up your statements with verifiable evidence, you should probably just stop
Trump lied, while Biden got his facts straight. Clearly, an old man with our best interests at heart is better than a cheap imitation of Hitler.
Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassmentthat consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”,[5] and has been likened to a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings.[6] The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki,[7] which The Independent called “the most apt description of Twitter you’ll ever see”.[8]
Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off, or as emojis: “🤔🤔🤔”[1]) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one’s opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.
The tactic is closely related to loaded questions or leading questions (which are usually employed when using it), Gish Gallops (when asking a huge number of rapid-fire questions without regard for the answers), and Argumentum ad nauseam (when asking the same question over and over in an attempt to overwhelm refutations).
Your dissembling changes nothing. It only confirms my claim that you’re arguing in bad faith.
Thanks for that!
well i am missing your point i guess
Yes, despite it being very simple and my having explained it clearly…
sorry
No, being “confusing and distracting” by muddying the waters was you whole point. You’re clearly arguing in bad faith. It’s just that I called you out.
Facing the consequences of your actions is not a state of victimhood.
“Fuck your feelings”
— MAGA
just because I had something to add doesn’t mean I missed you point.
that’s a fine song and dance you do.
let me know when you can back up you claims with evidence, instead of showing ed hearings…
That was “my claim”.
Backed up with nothing but excuses and self-serving bullshit. You have zero evidence to back up your “claims” …
Blaming me for calling you out and then blaming both me and others for your own actions and their consequences is textbook projection.
Facing the consequences of your actions is not a state of victimhood
This appears to be an issue with accurate reporting. Considerations like this would make the data make a lot more sense.
The problem is the interpretation by those running the study.
How can they have a military tribunal for someone who was never in the military?