The “always has been” should have been in German
The “always has been” should have been in German
I watched a movie about that guy when I was a kid
Misogyny was a small part of it and mostly used as an insult to people that had questions. Kamala hasn’t been accused of any crimes as far as I know. That’s the biggest difference between the two campaigns, aside from the fact that everyone is relieved Biden is leaving office by choice. Hilary might have even been able to win this election, but I definitely would rather have Kamala over Hillary.
People hated Hillary though. I know everyone who liked her wanted to say it was sexism but the Clinton’s are fucking crooks. I don’t like that Kamala put a bunch of people in prison for weed but there isn’t any evidence that she killed people for political gain.
Good point, I wish I thought of that when someone presented the question to me
I hate Trump with a fucking passion. But he was president for 4 years and did nothing like that. Why didn’t he do it then? Why would he wait to be reelected instead of doing it when he actually had power?
I’m sorry for your loss. He was a good boy.
It didn’t age well imo
I don’t think white people who are proud of their race have ever been more scared of being a minority. Obama being president enraged and scared them, Trump let them feel like those feelings were justified and perfectly acceptable. You are right though, I hope it works out in our favor too
His supporters are afraid. I think, luckily for us, since the fear is based on social issues instead of financial, it won’t work for him the way it did for Hitler. But my point is that people who are scared don’t think straight, pretty much in general and dumb people who are scared act on that fear making it everyone else’s problem. That’s what we’re dealing with, the actions of a lot of dumb and scared people being influenced by a few evil people.
This was an important question a few years ago. Isn’t it way too late now?
Fallout New Vegas was right
What are you talking about? Nobody mentioned politics in this thread.
There are smart homophobes. They use science, however flawed it is, to promote their arguments. Cutting out religion would take care of the few vocal people who genuinely believe being gay is against their religion but it definitely wouldn’t take care of the larger problem which has always been xenophobia.
Thank you for elaborating the actual case, this makes sense.
This is obviously a victory for humanity overall, but does anyone think the Supreme Court could take this new definition and use it to take guns away from regular people? I’m an idiot so if anyone can tell me why this isn’t a possibility, I’ll be relieved. The thing is, if Trump getting elected again does lead to the fall of democracy in this country (which I doubt, but it’s definitely more possible than any other candidate we’ve ever had), couldn’t the Supreme Court take guns away from people who opposed him?
In the picture posted below,I counted at least 12 lol
Definitely, or at the very least The Union Pacific Big Boy
Is that the shortest way to say that?😂