I really wanted a “I’m focused on the future” retort from Walz.
I really wanted a “I’m focused on the future” retort from Walz.
Nothing like a threat to the capital investments of a few very rich people to get the socialized bailout money flowing.
Trump needs to be sentenced.
Without further specific context, I just assumed this was a parody piece given the recent revelations.
It has certainly been an expedient way to make money (via Peter Thiel). And one of their “thought leaders” is a Usenet troll named Curtis Yarvin. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug
Behind the Bastards just dropped an episode on the weirdo too. https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236323/
This has been around for ages (in Internet time). And the connection to Vance is one step.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug
Behind the Bastards just dropped an episode on the weirdo too. https://www.iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-the-bastards-29236323/
Trump, again, is just the useful idiot.
It’s either “with the states” or “with powerful exceptions,” you can’t dictate both.
But his base is too dumb to understand. I’m actually kind of shocked the Overton window has shifted enough that “powerful exceptions” are in the Republican position.
Having met a number of CEOs, definitely not. They’re dollar store brains and smooth talking metaphor machines. They operate almost completely on intuition and use bullshit to back it up.
I’m sure there are exceptions.
But what about a concept of a plan?? Inquiring minds…
Why hasn’t the billionaire properly secured himself? We all know the public option is de minimus, so why hasn’t he gone deep into the private mercenary world to hire the best?
/s if it wasn’t obvious
A cacophony, to be sure.
I’m upvoting this because it gives me the shivers to imagine. It would definitely be something.
For legalization, but historically toed the party line.
Absolutely.
Sidenote: I keep seeing “xitter” being used, is it safe to assume it’s pronounced “shitter”?
They’re required by some dog boarding/daycare places.
Me too! (I actually found it on mastodon)
Oh I have no preconceptions about anonymity here, I just don’t want yet another hackable database with my PII that I don’t need to give up. It’s more of an op sec kind of issue (I say as a former cyber security dev).
Fewer is better!
Let’s test a mastodon link instead!
https://mastodon.social/@KraftTea/112922529525115222
Or or, and hear me out (actual campaign presence): https://truthsocial.com/@KamalaHQ/posts/112917651295728303
Yep, totally get it. I’ll squeeze by as long as I can for the sake of privacy.
I wonder if it’s more because we frame the question by altering the structure to indicate the appropriate response.
We could just as well ask “you are from where?” Or “your name is what?” That matches the expected sentence structure of a response, and the natural pitch rises.