

They didn’t even have lots of guns the last few times either…
They didn’t even have lots of guns the last few times either…
I do not recommend this Van gogh method
The simplified answer is, they get shredded, then various processes both physical and chemical are taken to extract the important materials and the rest is disposed of. Often certain metals will dissolve in specific acids or chemicals, then you can take that liquid with the specifically dissolved metal and precipitate it out. Often melting it down can also separate different metals when they have different melting points.
The simple answer is that their brain doesn’t work the same as a neurotypical person.
The question is like asking why driving a motorcycle is different than driving a car. They just function differently.
Us strategy, punch your neighbour in the face then ask to borrow an egg
Brilliant strategy
Please sir, can I have some more?
https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-l-chapter-2
Here’s the US rules for revocation of Naturalized Citizenship. It sounds like the OP has been naturalized for longer than 5 years, so essentially there is no way to do it anymore unless they had originally obtained it fraudulently.
The UK laws are actually a lot more lax in terms of reasons to revoke than these.
A green card is not citizenship, Naturalized means they have full citizenship.
You’re fine for now. Keep protesting, but keep your head in the game if they government starts changing their tactics.
They are going to go after “violent” situations first, so try to avoid those.
Agreed, the number of refusals, defections, and just straight up surrendering would cause massive problems for any sort of invasion.
Not to mention the basic fact that there’s nothing to “capture” these days.
If they take the government buildings by force, does that change anything?
They’ve only “taken” Canada if the people start paying taxes to the US government, and that’s unlikely to happen in an invasion situation. People would just stop paying their taxes entirely. It’s not like troops could go door to door collecting, they may be able to collect it from some specific large businesses, but the rest of the economy immediately goes underground
There’s no reasonable enforcement measure for the mass riots that would occur with the number of troops they could afford to deploy to Canada. If they start ordering troops to just gun down every riot, the fight back from the Canadians is going to make Afghanistan look like a cake walk.
If they start shutting down basic functions like electricity or banking to control the population, then the number of guns Canada owns is going to become a huge problem for the troops they have here. The US military would also have to secure the border somehow as some people will try to flee into the US, and some of those people “fleeing” would then turn around and start attacking US assets in the US.
And that’s not to mention the almost million Canadians who currently live in the US, are they going to try Japanese internment camps again?
A physical invasion is just completely infeasible. He’s going to keep pushing it economically and politically, and it’s very likely he’s long gone (either out of office or dead) before Canada would cave to those pressures.
We could never agree.
We tried creating a new one called Esperanto, it didn’t work out either.
While you wait, I suggest reading the book called Machine Man by Max Barry which is a fictional story about a person doing just that.
Good time to be worried now, after you voted his ass into office.
It’s not like he hid it.
I honestly don’t think the US would benefit from Canada’s non-existentence. Any sort of actual war would cause far more damage to the US than any sort of possible benefit they may see later.
Gonna make Afghanistan feel like a trial run when Canadians and sympathetic Americans fight back.
I would not be surprised at all if the white house gets burned down again if they actually attacked us.
Valve is one of the profitable companies in tech, it ain’t going anywhere.
I bet we could find someone less qualified.
It just would be difficult to find one outside of a hospital or care home.
He’s going to do it again, you’re being delusional if you think he will change in the next few years.
Move on.
They shouldn’t have a veto power. They should only be able to control their own choices.
If a woman loses even 1-2% of the vote simply due to Misogyny, they’re at a massive disadvantage. If you don’t think Misogyny exists in the “independent” voters or even in the solidly democratic voters, you’re not paying attention to reality and pretending the world is better than it actually is.