All you need to know about doxxing is the origin of the phrase “we did it, reddit!”
All you need to know about doxxing is the origin of the phrase “we did it, reddit!”
And they do. My Philips TV didn’t even ask for DNS until hardcoded IPs for Netflix et al. timed out. And when it did, it asked Google, not my router.
It’s kinda funny, though: the Overton window shofted so far to the right we’re at a point where both parties pin the blame for everything wrong in America on foreigners.
Forgot to shuffle accounts around, I guess.
IDK, FRY was de facto kicked out of the UN in 1992.
She’s stealing the planet’s cool! Stop her!
I… get the feeling you’re not trying to have a conversation about the particular incident in the OP article. Which is fine, and good, but don’t overproject.
Simple: one of the basic requirements of being in power is wanting to have power. It’s also one of the basic reasons one shouldn’t be allowed to have power.
-Are y’all with the cult?
-It’s not a cult, it’s an organisation that promotes the deprograming of-
-This is it.
Simple, we wrrie down the information on how to read the discs!
“I don’t approve of political jokes; I’ve seen too many in office.”
Oh, it’s not the concern that’s funny, if they had that selfawareness it would be admirable. Instead, you have people pat themselves on the back for how aware they are every time they encounter a validating piece of propaganda they, of course, fall for. Big “I know a messiah when I see one, I’ve followed quite a few!” energy.
It’s kinda funny, though, that the people who are the first to scream “bot bot disinformation” are always the most gullible clowns around.
I meant that the money donated isn’t that much, compared to the existing endowment. I think it was Adam Tooze’s argument, that IIRC Columbia could basically afford to lose most if not all donation streams and just fund itself from the stock market. And his interpretation as to why they reacted so violently is either fully ideological on behalf of the admin, or because Colombia is actually underperforming as asset management, a panicking reasserting of who runs the place, which is in a way also ideological.
It’s not unaware. It’s a policy that allows protest as an abstract idea, as long as nobody actually ever does it. It’s reminiscent of Zizeks visiting grandma joke.
From what I understand it’s not even that much money. The logic seems to be that the idea of democratic money management must be stomped out regardless of the cause it’s advocated for.
Man, if only Germany didn’t gift them those subs…
Yeah, but the move there is to sear the bun insides while making the patty.
And hold back sea level rise!
Have you considered that what they are doing is supporting Israel, not for any justification they provide, but because they genuinely, ideologically agree with what is being done?