This story is all over the news, multiple shooters using fully automatic weapons in a suspected assassination? Yeah that’ll draw some eyeballs.
This story is all over the news, multiple shooters using fully automatic weapons in a suspected assassination? Yeah that’ll draw some eyeballs.
Call me pisher but I’m not sure I’m on board with fighting terrorism with more terrorism.
I believe ravhall agrees with you, they were saying what IAmTheTot says doesn’t make sense.
Well I’m sorry if that’s how you interpret reality, honestly I don’t care about “the message”, I care about the goal of TRUMP NOT FUCKING UP THIS COUNTRY MORE THAN HE ALREADY HAS.
I mean unless you are intentionally being obtuse I feel like you know damn well what people mean when they say “A vote for X is a vote for Trump”. It’s not a coincidence that so many Republican allies and organizations are promoting and pumping up 3rd party candidates to run in various swing states and pull votes away from Harris, this isn’t a new tactic and historically has absolutely changed elections.
I mean this is pretty obvious correlation not causation. If you don’t have guns in the house you probably aren’t giving kids gun handling lessons.
I don’t know anything about this guy but I don’t think it’s fake, he was 18 and believed some bullshit, he’s not the first, but this bullshit had a massive impact on his future. Trump doesn’t care how many lives he ruins, he just doesn’t.
You might be the most low effort person ever. Good luck in your future life, you’ll need it.
Uh huh, on my screen it’s literally 2 comments below this one, kinda feels like you’re looking for an excuse not to answer. Kinda like that time a wrestling organization looked for a bullshit excuse to disqualify someone, what a lovely parallel.
The thread begins when someone says something. Then people reply. ELSEWHERE in this thread is a reply, from me, quoting Snopes. Go back to when systemglitch commented in this post, follow the path to my reply quoting Snopes.
Ok I’ll repeat myself: elsewhere in this thread I replied quoting the Snopes article on this subject. Are those instructions too confusing for you?
So you ignored the Snopes article, got it. You only seem to reply to the comments that are easy for you to deflect, how interesting.
First of all, and you knew I was gonna lead with this, The Daily Mail?
Ok, let’s pretend that’s a legit news organization, now read my comment quoting Snopes and tell me if that answers any of your “questions”.
You seem to be misunderstanding, intentionally I would guess. They claimed they did a test to “confirm” she was not a woman, I’m saying that’s a steaming hot load of bullshit and they were just looking for an excuse and they have no results to release.
Please cite your sources saying there are news reports that she’s a man.
Why does she have to? Why would she have a copy of a test allegedly done by a 3rd party that, based on news reports, was just using it as an excuse to eliminate her for beating a Russian opponent?
But they haven’t said what test they performed to determine this, which would be the norm so the results can be verified.
That doesn’t make her not female, or trans. From the Snopes article about this:
There are genetic conditions, termed differences of sexual development, in which biological females are born with XY chromosomes but possess female anatomy, or that affect how a biological female regulates and reacts to testosterone, causing levels typically associated with males. Though there is no independent confirmation that Khelif has these conditions, people born this way would legally be considered female or intersex.
Debates over these issues in the context of women’s sports have nothing to do with a purported “woke” or “trans agenda,” because such instances involve women who were born as women, identify as women and have not undergone any sex reassignment surgery or procedure to change this fact. That is what IOC spokesperson Mark Adams meant when he clarified to the press “this is not a transgender issue.”
Gender-reassignment procedures require significant financial and medical resources. The notion that a woman from a rural western Algerian village who sold scrap metal to support her boxing career would have had the ability to undergo such a procedure in a deeply conservative Muslim country that prohibits the practice is extremely unlikely, at best.
Yup.
Batman Arkham Asylum and (probably) Arkham City.
It doesn’t, it’s a perception bias caused by a few different things like others here have mentioned, but also freshly grown hair tends to be thicker, then tapers off as it grows, so it SEEMS thicker.