We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • silentdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    We asked A.I. to create a copyrighted image from the Joker movie. It generated a copyrighted image as expected.

    Ftfy

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      What it proves is that they are feeding entire movies into the training data. It is excellent evidence for when WB and Disney decides to sue the shit out of them.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I have that exact same .jpeg stored on my computer and I don’t even know where it came from. I don’t even watch superhero films

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            They’re not selling it though, they’re selling a machine with which you could commit copyright infringement. Like my PC, my HDD, my VCR…

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              No, they are selling you time in a digital room with a machine, and all of the things it spits out at you.

              You dont own the program generating these images. You are buying these images and the time to tinker with the AI interface.

              • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I’m not buying anything, most AI is free as in free beer and open source e.g. Stable Diffusion, Mistral…

                Unlike hardware it’s actually accessible to everyone with sufficient know-how.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Youre pretty young, huh. When something on the internet from a big company is free, youre the product.

                  Youre bug and stress testing their hardware, and giving them free advertising. While using the cheapest, lowest quality version that exists, and only for as long as they need the free QA.

                  The real AI, and the actual quality outputs, cost money. And once they are confident in their server stability, the scraps youre picking over will get a price tag too.

                  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Literally what are you on about? I run my models locally, the only hardware i am stress testing is my own.

                    I don’t support commercialization of anything, least of all AI, and the highest quality outputs come from customized refined models in the open source and AI art communities, not anything made by a corpo.

                    I think you must be literally 12 yourself if you think you can comment on this tech without even understanding models and weights are something you download if you want anything beyond fancy often wrong Google search, they’re not run in the “cloud” like your fancy iPad web apps and they are open source.