• jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well, that’s the intent at least. Not to form an opinion.

      • emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If you’re of the idea that it’s not a genocide you’re wrong. There is no alternate explanation. If it were giving a fact that would be correct. The fact that it’s giving both sides is an opinion rather than a fact.

        If their ibtebtion was fact only. The answer would have been yes

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You’re arguing with an AI. It’s a computer. It doesn’t have an opinion. It gives perspective on both sides and you determine an answer. Just because you have more conviction it doesn’t make the AI formulate an opinion.