• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Biden has no control

    He could stop sending a new shipment of the very weapons used to commit genocide with every day and a half.

    It might not stop it immediately, but it would at least make it more difficult for Netanyahu’s fascist apartheid regime to keep blowing the shit out of innocent civilians if they have to look elsewhere for the bombs to do so with.

    Plus, there’s hardly any way to be more clearly an accomplice to war crimes than insisting on sending weapons to be used to commit war crimes regardless of congressional approval.

    • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Biden is legally obligated by treaty to provide Israel with arms. Not doing so would give those maniacs in the house actual reason to impeach

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        First of all, no he isn’t. In fact, it’s illegal for the US government to supply arms that might be used in the commission of war crimes. In this case there’s not even any doubt.

        As for the GOP, they’ve already demonstrated that whether or not they try to impeach has nothing to do with reality. Even if they DID somehow manage to make impeachment stick by a one-vote majority, there’s literally no risk that 2/3 of the senate will vote to convict, so that’s not anything remotely resembling a valid excuse to keep contributing to a genocide either.

        • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          He actually is in the case that the initial arms shipment was sent, Israel was attacked by Hamas and he had to respond by sending aid. He has gone on record stating that the current war crimes Israel has been committing raise question of the legality of providing further support.

          Obviously still remains to be seen if anything will actually come of that though. Words are cheap.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            He has gone on record stating that the current war crimes Israel has been committing raise question of the legality of providing further support.

            While continuing to send the weapons anyway, as much as he possibly can without congressional approval.

            His public pretense at being a moderating influence means less than nothing as long as he keeps being an active supplier of the genocide.

            • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              There’s no congressional approval needed as he is driven by treaty to provide arms, if anything he is compelled by Congress to send arms as long as Israel is at war as a US ally due to NATO.

              He’s trying to make the argument that Israel committing genocide with those arms is reason to withdraw support, unfortunately the US government moves at a glacial pace on it’s best day to the point that the US military is actually somehow faster. Given the number of Democrats that do support Israel, its entirely realistic that he could get successfully impeached if he failed to comply.

              Anyway… Thanks for the civil debate but work is starting so I need to go, I’ll read your next message bit I probably won’t have time to reply.