• bitwaba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    You don’t have to track a car to limit how fast it goes. Speed governerors exist inside gas powered cars already. All that has to be done is 1) legally require a manufacturer to limit speeds of their vehicles, and 2) prosecute them when they do not implement those restrictions. The rest is lawyers and lines of code (and lines of coke I guess)

    • suodrazah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You need location data to be able to determine what limit to impose.

      And I bet you anything it will be a cloud based system.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          They don’t transmit the speed limit of the current road, and for things like construction they’ll need real-time updates.

          I’m certain they won’t want to push the entire database out to every vehicle for every update…

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I have a hard time believing it would be impossible to wire up a device that sends out a wireless signal with the local speed limit at every speed limit sign.

            Why does it need to go to a database for it instead of have a receiver on the vehicle itself to pull data as it passes speed limit signs?

            In fact, a centralized database would likely have more problems with not being accurate or current. Have you ever dealt with government databases?

            Edit: Part of the reason the database would be trash is because speed limits are set by cities, not by the state. So in the database scenario every time a city updates their speed limit, they have to document all the zones and upload them to the database. All it takes is paperwork getting backed up a week for that to cause problems.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                We got a tough guy here.

                EDIT: Also I’m fairly sure that destruction of government property is a felony and if it’s wired for this, it could easily be wired to take and send photos when tampered with, but you do you. I guess people do just hate infrastructure more than *checks notes… being spied on. Because when given an alternative without a database, they shit on it.