• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re completely wrong about the idea that people who were poor in the 1970s were worse off than people today.

    Hunter Thompson’s book, “Hell’s Angels” has a chapter on the economics of being a biker/hippie/artist circa 1972. A biker could work for six months as a Union stevedore and earn enough to hit the road for two years. A part time waitress could earn enough to support herself and her musician boyfriend. A kid who graduated high school and got a minimum wage job could rent a one bedroom apartment and party and still put money in the bank.

    And don’t say that today’s tech is much better unless you can prove that real wages dropping resulted in the creation of the internet.

    • mob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      But would you consider that poor then? Maybe money was easier to obtain, but starvation/malnutrition rates have constantly been on a steady decline until the last few years. Not often you see people using a burlap sack to cloth their families, child labor, things like that. And we do have a lot of social programs like SNAP that didnt exist pre-1970s.1980s had the Homeless act. The world has changed drastically in the last 50-100 years.

      But I guess you could make solid arguments that the economy is generally harder now, so its worse for the majority, incuding the poor.