• tissek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think Pathfinder is as bad of a match for Larian as DnD mechanically speaking. Compare the sheer battlefield joy and chaos of DoS to the austere strictness in BG3. And Pathfinder is in the same vein. Better I think it would be if Larian picks up a setting fitting their humour and shenanigans. Heard good things about Discworld.

    • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I guess people just have different preferences. To me, the chaos of DoS turned rather monotone. You could get rich by betting that every combat encounter would end with half the map on fire. It was a real issue that Larian fixed in bg3 thankfully.

      And have you payed pathfinder wrath of the righteous? In my opinion, the combat experience is better than DoS 2 and bg3. I will say that I enjoyed the freedom of movement in DoS 2 though, it made positioning a core part of the combat.

      • tissek@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Played a good bit of Kingmaker and while not as refined as WotR I think is very similar. I agree with you that the DoS chaos can be a bit monotone and is too much. But I’d take that over the environmental flatness of other cRPGs.

        • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Environmental flatness isn’t really tied to the game mechanics/rules though. Larian are just using a better engine with a larger budget than their competitors