Communities around the U.S. have seen shootings carried out with weapons converted to fully automatic in recent years, fueled by a staggering increase in small pieces of metal or plastic made with a 3D printer or ordered online. Laws against machine guns date back to the bloody violence of Prohibition-era gangsters. But the proliferation of devices known by nicknames such as Glock switches, auto sears and chips has allowed people to transform legal semi-automatic weapons into even more dangerous guns, helping fuel gun violence, police and federal authorities said.

The (ATF) reported a 570% increase in the number of conversion devices collected by police departments between 2017 and 2021, the most recent data available.

The devices that can convert legal semi-automatic weapons can be made on a 3D printer in about 35 minutes or ordered from overseas online for less than $30. They’re also quick to install.

“It takes two or three seconds to put in some of these devices into a firearm to make that firearm into a machine gun instantly,” Dettelbach said.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This reads like pig-induced hysterics.

    I’m not anti-gun myself, but there are far better arguments for the anti-gun crowd to use than this.

      • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean it’s a gun that fires continuously with a single trigger pull. How is that not a machine gun? Yeah it’s a machine pistol that’ll spend a clip in 3 seconds, but it’s still a machine gun.

        • harderian729@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s an automatic pistol…

          “Machine” doesn’t mean automatic, lol.

          Just use words for what they are instead of trying to replace them for shock value.

          I don’t expect you to do this, though.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Do you really think that if everyone learns precise technical gun terms that gun control arguments will change?

            • KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              It would certainly help.

              What is the point in making up terms for firearms that have never been used for them even by the military?

              It only serves to muddy the waters and scare people.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m pretty sure the massive amount of gun violence is what scares people, not terms that aren’t used by the military.

                In fact, from what I’ve seen, the people who really care about technical terms are the ones who want to find them to get around gun regulations or stop them from happening in the first place.

                I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been told that there’s no such thing as an assault weapon when there was an assault weapon ban in law, meaning there clearly is whether or not some people don’t accept that as a technically valid term.

                • KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The term “assault weapon” is being used by people who know nothing about firearms to refer to anything that isn’t an old bolt action these days.

                  Its meaningless

          • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            The comparison I use for these conversion devices is it’s like putting high-octane fuel in a dodge caravan and calling it an F1 racer.

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Nobody is saying that putting “faster” bullets into a gun makes it fully automatic (or a machine gun) so your example is silly at best.

              This is about 3D printables that fundamentally change the speed at which a gun chamber/clip can be emptied.

              Do better.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                a gun chamber/clip

                I’ve seen so many people get absurdly upset if you misnomer the place in the gun where the bullets go.

                Incidentally, these same people hate pronouns.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            “Machine” doesn’t mean automatic, lol.

            Machines are devices that leverage physical forces to some desirable effect. Strictly speaking, all guns are machine guns

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not an anti-gun argument.

      The theory is that you CAN’T regulate guns because people will just 3D print inferior copies.