Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists’ permission. And that’s without getting into AI’s negative drag on the environment.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It literally is. The person I replied to explicitly said it’s a good tool but has no creativity. I said the creativity comes from the users skill.

    If it’s a tool requiring a user to bring it to its full potential… then again thats what is being talked about.

    These tools do literally nothing unless a user is involved. Be it setting up auto responses to certain text, or explicitly handing it instructions and tweaking as they go.