A family in Naples, Florida, whose home was struck by debris that fell to Earth from outer space and punched a hole in the roof is pursuing $80,000 from Nasa in compensation for damages.

The law firm Cranfill Sumner said in a press release that it filed a claim on behalf of plaintiff Alejandro Otero and his family.

A metallic cylinder slab from a cargo pallet that had been released by the International Space Station in 2021 hit the Otero family home on 8 March 2024 while their son Daniel was home. No one was injured, though it created a hole in the roof and floor.

Otero told Wink News that the object almost hit his son, who was two rooms over.

The US space agency later confirmed the debris was from its flight support equipment. A section of the debris remained intact rather than disintegrating after it entered Earth’s atmosphere before falling to the surface.

  • Warp10Lizard@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hate frivolous lawsuits as much as anyone, but this seems very reasonable. Fix my stuff and let me keep the piece and we’re cool.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      5 months ago

      That was my thought as well. Seems like a reasonable amount to cover repairs and some extra without being excessive.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 months ago

      New roof and floor. Plus whatever other damage to the room, plus a bit of buffer for legal fees.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 months ago

        Surprised that they having to go to court. Like “we pay your repair bills, some for the lawyer. Everyone wins.”

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Might be required for whatever insurance process NASA has to follow.

          Policy requirements like that are why you see scenarios where people are suing family members when the issue is clearly covered by insurance.

          • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Federal government agencies rarely have insurance for things like these. The federal government is self-insured.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’d be asking for more — emotional distress, rent to live somewhere else while they fixed my house for months, additional money for the inconvenience.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s hardly even a story - house repairs cost a lot of money, and NASA’s equipment (by their own admission) caused the damage.

    It’s only the police that get away with ruining people’s things without paying.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I dunno, if a car kicks up a rock from the road and smashes a windscreen, that’s considered no one’s fault. Even though the car in front kicked it up.

      In this case, NASA have assumed that things would burn up in re-entry, based on past experience and modelling. For some reason that didn’t happen here. However, that might not be enough to prove liability - if NASA is considered to already make reasonable efforts to prevent this.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        A rock falling from a truck’s load on the highway however is the fault of the truck owner, regardless of whatever bumper sticker they want to put saying otherwise. Trucks are required to properly secure their loads.

        This isn’t random space debris that existed and entered the atmosphere without NASA involvement.

        • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Indeed, the difference between the two is that a driver has no responsibility for any debris already present on the road that they inadvertently caused to damage something. They are however responsible for damage caused by any object they themselves introduced to the roadway.

          The NASA equivalent would be pretty straightforward, they are not responsible for any space rocks that they accidentally disturbed from orbit and caused to land on your house, but they are fully responsible if thier own craft or parts thereof fell from space onto your house.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    NASA probably doesn’t want to pay this because it would set a precedent that they have to pay for other space debris incidents. The days of counting on debris landing somewhere harmless or burning up in the atmosphere would be over.