• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    For god sakes don’t use Brave. Brave has been caught doing shady shit in the past, and the CEO is a piece of shit on top of that.

    Use Firefox with privacy addons.

    • Ahri Boy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Vivaldi and Firefox are better choices.

      PS: considering reviewing Brave again. Everyone should contribute to their source code.

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Would you hire a bigot to run your company so long as the numbers go up? Fuck that mentality.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Mozilla was doing poorly when he was CEO as well. Google has been doing everything they can to force Chrome.

            He was CEO for 11 days and in that time all he did was cause a bunch of websites to show a banner requesting that users install a different browser in order to not support a homophobe.

            There was also a boatload of articles about his homophobia that brought Mozilla into disrepute.

            • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The problem is appointing Mozilla leadership based on ideological purity rather than technical merit.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Firstly, who says that’s happening?

                And secondly, this isn’t entirely about purity - even if you personally (and I’m not saying this is your view, btw) don’t give the slightest fuck about gay people and you’re fine with them having fewer rights/fine with others actively trying to strip their rights away - others aren’t, and it’s harmful to the business.

                Eich was CEO for 11 days and achieved nothing other than a Firefox boycott, dozens of negative Firefox headlines, and Firefox being known as the homophobic browser.

                Even from a cold-hearted “fuck human rights, I care only about market share” POV, Eich was still an awful CEO decision.

    • cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      But in iOS , addons (ublock origin) are not available at least outside EU, so brave is the better choice as it got brave shield . everywhere else I use Firefox.

    • markon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is one issues though… Firefox is extremely slow and clunky. I hate to say it, but on mobile it is hard to use all the time for me. On desktop I’m Firefox 95% of the time but some sites don’t work very well with the much slower JavaScript engine. This isn’t to defend Brave or any chromium browser but we gotta get Firefox up to speed.

      • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is on iOS. There is no Firefox (geko) or Chromium, there is only skins of Safari so your point is moot. For now.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Firefox is fine on mobile in my eyes.

        At least the Android version, even on my 5 year old Exynos phone it does what I need / want from a browser. Allows (some) extensions, lets me zoom wherever I want to on any page, has a reader mode and is snappy enough on old hardware.

        Chrome tries to be / do far too much for me, just fuck off and let me browse the web. I do like the dynamic colours that Chrome on mobile uses on different webpages, is hot.

        However Chrome gives me dirty Microsoft vibes, and it’s pretty hard to shake that stank.

        If your on iOS welcome to the walled garden. Hope you live in the EU.

      • akilou@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re Apple users. They aren’t used to making any decisions when it comes to how their phones work

            • kameecoding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              They also work how I want them to, well instead of having to fight my own phone, it just works, go figure

              • rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Oh give me a break with this nonsense. Android has an 80% global market share, your average dipshit uses it just fine. It also “just works” and very frequently works better than iOS.

                Safari is a shit tier browser when it comes to web standards and performance. It’s hilarious how iOS users try so hard to justify blowing $1000 on a phone when an Android 1/2 of the price does exactly the same thing and is just as easy to use. Why can’t you just enjoy your apple garbage without having this weird superiority complex?

                • kameecoding@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Uff, projecting a bit aren’t we? I didn’t start the flame war, the other guy started by shitting on iphone users.

                  And yes, android phones do the 80% of Iphones for less money, but you know what? Those last 20% I do care about.

                  Just something as simple as switching my wireless earbuds between my computer and phone seamlessly, compare the experience between android + windows/linux and the experience with Iphone + macbook with airpods.

                  Small shit like that " just working" makes a huge difference in UX and thats what I care about.

                  Not sure how Safari being garbage is relevant, so is chrome, I use firefox, so, whatever?

                  I have has wireless bluetooth earbuds since like 2018, all of them had the issue that if I put my phone in certain pockets they would cut out, etc.

                  Even my airpods had that issue with my latest OnePlus phone, guess what, never happened once with Iphone, it just works, I don’t have to think about which pocket I should be putting my phone into.

                  The most annoying thing about the Iphone is the keyboard, but I am getting used to it, tried swiftkey, but just as much of a laggy poece of shit as it is on android

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is a proprietary rebranding of Chromium. Can’t say I’d recommend it over (or in addition to) Firefox.

      We need less forks of Chromium. Any one company (Google in this case) having total control over browser engines is dangerous, and is a big reason why the whole Apple/Safari/Webkit situation is such a big deal to begin with.

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Remember kids, if it’s Chromium based, it’s still part of the problem. The Chromium project only exists to provide the illusion of choice. Don’t let Google have the power to dictate web standards at will.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The worrisome thing is that there’s no alternative other than Firefox, or Safari on Apple platforms. Every single other browser is Chromium.

          We must defend Firefox at all costs, it’s the last glimmer of freedom.

      • FatCat@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The list is randomized, I’ve seen several screenshots with different order.

    • latetolemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Cause Firefox is trash and Mozilla a shell of their former selves?

      Also it’s so liberating to speak your mind without caring what some scrub with his sweaty fingers on the downvote button thinks

    • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Vivaldi is extremely slow on IOS and 2gb+ big. Firefox has no extensions so no Adblock. Generally there are few privacy friendly/Foss browsers on IOS.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Generally there are few privacy friendly/Foss browsers on IOS.

        Um, Safari is so privacy friendly that Google regularly asks me if I’m human. For example it has “private relay” which is similar to TOR* so trackers don’t even know your IP address — combine that with blocking third party cookies (and even some first party cookies) by default and providing false data to fight fingerprinting even if you don’t block trackers entirely - and blocking them entirely is as simple as installing an extension. Private Relay also adds a layer of encryption on top of DNS queries and otherwise unencrypted http traffic… so your ISP/Cellular provider/Work/School/abusive husband/etc can’t track you

        99.99% of the Safari’s code is FOSS — dual licensed under LGPL and BSD.

        It’s not the browser I use - pretty lacking in the feature department, but it’s definitely more pro-privacy than Brave or FireFox. I’ve never had to jump through a captcha to use Google in those browsers.

        (* if anything, it’s better than TOR… with that service there’s a risk your entry/exit nodes are tracking you. With Private Relay it’s always one of Apple’s servers for the entry node and a reputable cloud company like Akamai for the exit node. Both would have to be compromised in order to identify you… maybe a nation state can do that, but a big data tracking company definitely can’t)

        • Muehe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          it’s definitely more pro-privacy than Brave or FireFox. I’ve never had to jump through a captcha to use Google in those browsers.

          You have this backwards. Google showing you captchas is basically them saying they can’t match your browser to any know (shadow) profile they have already stored. So they aren’t sure you are a human and if so which one specifically. Getting harassed with a captcha is essentially like a badge of honour for your browsers privacy settings.

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because it blocks ads out of the box. I know its new tab screen causes a lot of y’all’s buttholes to clench because it mentions cryptocurrency, but there are harder things to ignore

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Careful, if you try to advocate or defend Brave on Lemmy, you’re stepping on a minefield.

    • agelord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Could you please clarify why the baseline needs to be at 0? I’m genuinely curious.

      • tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This graph gives the impression that the total installation number has been multipliés x4 or X5 while it is not the case when looking at the raw numbers.

        Any variation can look impressive if you zoom enough, that’s why you need a baseline at 0. This way you see thé entire scale of the phenomenon

        • summerof69@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          This graph gives the impression that the total installation number has been multipliés x4 or X5

          How so? It goes from ~7 to ~11. That’s not even x2.

          • geissi@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It goes from ~7 to ~11. That’s not even x2.

            Yes but the graph goes from 2 rectangles above the bottom line to 8 rectangles above the bottom line in that final surge.
            So visually, it looks like it has quadrupled.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No it doesn’t.

      It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine. It’s not a scientific paper.

      It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph. That’s significant enough to shout about.

      Imagine any change you could make surprising competition by 25% in any market. That’s huge.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine

        Define “perfectly fine”. It is clearly exaggerating the change. At a glance it looks more like a 5 times increase, not a 30% increase.

      • geissi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph

        But you don’t get that percentage from looking at the graph. You get that from looking at the numbers.
        The graph height increases by 300% in the last 3 months 9 days.

  • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Brave is garbage. It’s a cryptoscam adscam browser based on Chrome. For the love of god, use Firefox (or Vivaldi if you absolutely need chromium)

    • Samueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Brave is great, has configurable keybinds, nice default adblock block list, vertical tabs, syncing sessions without email, etc.

      And on android it can play youtube vids on the background.

      The crypto ads just get disabled on the new tab page, you don’t even have to go to the settings lol. And vivaldi is partially closed source btw.

        • Samueru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Brave is an interesting case, they found a way to make money that doesn’t involve tracking their users, making deals with google or be closed source lol

          If you hate that fine, I definitely prefer that than the other alternatives lol.

    • Clandestine@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t say I disagree, I’ve long abandoned it on my PC.

      But Brave has superb AdBlocking capabilities compared to every other browser for iPhone, so I’m still using it on my phone.

      • Samueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        But Brave has superb AdBlocking capabilities compared to every other browser for iPhone

        It is the same on android, it even lets me watch youtube vids without ads and in the background.

          • Samueru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Las time I could not watch youtube vids in the background in firefox.

            I also had trouble getting files that download multiple files at once to work on firefox.

    • elwy@fedit.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      At least on android Firefox has Google tracking built into the app among much other tracking/ads. If you don’t like Brave you may want to consider a Firefox fork. On IOS Brave is the only big browser with competent adblock afaik until/unless Firefox gets extensions going.

      Edit: I forgot criticizing Firefox is wrongthink on the fediverse and will get you donwnvoted no matter what. Even if it’s in the context of advising people to switch FROM Brave TO a Firefox fork on Android.

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        On IOS Brave is the only big browser with competent adblock afaik until/unless Firefox gets extensions going.

        Safari + AdGuard gave me no issues so far.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’ve been using Firefox on my android phones for years though, I don’t remember it ever being more involved then setting it as default on the popup on first launch.

  • just_change_it@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean sure I guess… but brave as a browser is atrocious. I don’t trust their bullshit at all.

    After all who doesn’t want a crypto wallet in their browser? that’s the safest place for it right?

  • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Misleading graph trying to make a 150% increase look like a 1000% increase.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Read the left side? 7k-11k, the removed useless information, provided you read what is actually there first.