0x2d@lemmy.ml to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 8 months agofree-mp3-download.net is shutting downmessage-squaremessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up17arrow-down1message-squarefree-mp3-download.net is shutting down0x2d@lemmy.ml to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelemmyvore@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-28 months agoYou can tell the difference between 320kbps and 160kbps in a blind test? If you can tell anything above 160 you’re in a select minority (and using great equipment). Most people will never have any use for 320.
minus-squaresus@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoYoutube actually uses 128kbps opus, which should be significantly better than 160kbps mp3 but the real problem is that you can’t know what quality the uploader used, it all gets recompressed by youtube.
You can tell the difference between 320kbps and 160kbps in a blind test?
If you can tell anything above 160 you’re in a select minority (and using great equipment). Most people will never have any use for 320.
Youtube actually uses 128kbps opus, which should be significantly better than 160kbps mp3
but the real problem is that you can’t know what quality the uploader used, it all gets recompressed by youtube.